Shavers-Holmes and Sam Peter -Wlad Klichko

[Kimmy]

i agree, a very poor version of it

I can't understand all the interest in Wlad. He is chinny, cuts up and has fallen to every world class puncher he has faced.
As soon as peter connects with a serious shot the fight will be over soon. Wlad can't recuperate very well either and Peter appears to have a decent chin.
Sam Peter in 5 rounds!

[Nautilus]

just wanted to remind that this was Emmannuel Stewart's comparison

[Kimmy]

just wanted to remind that this was Emmannuel Stewart's comparison

Sure, Manny said it, but you`d expect him to wouldn't you!

[Nautilus]

Sure, Manny said it, but you`d expect him to wouldn't you!

to give a confidence boost to Wlad?

[McKay 1]

Larry Holmes and Wlad Klistchko are totally different style fighters.

Shavers is a way bigger puncher than sam Peter and a way bettter overall fighter. He hit Larry with his best shot. Larry got up and won the next round. Larry just dismantled Shavers in that fight, the 2nd one. It was beautifull to watch Holmes in his prime dismantle somebody like that. But comparing Holmes and Wlad is silly. Wlad I think is a good fighter, but nothing really compared to Larry Holmes, and Sam Peter sure as hell is no Shavers.

[Parodius]

Homles had a better jab then Wlad, also his chin was better. It doesn't surprise me this is coming from Manny Steward. Steward says some really ****** thing sometimes. The big question is Peter himself, he is a big question mark. He hits has hard as anyone today, but Peter chin has never been tested. If he lands a perfect punch on Wlad, I don't know if Wlad will be standing.