was McCloskey a moving punchbag?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fix
    Banned
    • Apr 2011
    • 1123
    • 51
    • 10
    • 1,295

    #1

    was McCloskey a moving punchbag?

    he hardly threw many shots in the fight, it looked like khan made him concentrate almost fully on defense (which was good defense) but it left mccloskey unable to mount any real offense. didnt make khan look good, but its almost like khan was fighting a moving punchbag
    4
    yes.. he could hardly throw s***
    50.00%
    2
    no.. it was part of the "gameplan"
    50.00%
    2
  • *Khan
    Banned
    • Feb 2011
    • 2479
    • 135
    • 244
    • 3,193

    #2
    He did a good job being akward, but being akward doesn't win you fights.

    Comment

    • T-97
      BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 14808
      • 566
      • 628
      • 22,958

      #3
      Originally posted by *Khan
      He did a good job being akward, but being akward doesn't win you fights.
      This.

      Anyone that says he was giving Khan problems is being silly. He was stopping Khan from landing cleanly, but mounted no attack of his own... is that really problematic? I wouldn't say that Kevin Johnson gave Vitali K problems, he just came to survive, same as Paul...

      Comment

      • Fix
        Banned
        • Apr 2011
        • 1123
        • 51
        • 10
        • 1,295

        #4
        Originally posted by T-97
        This.

        Anyone that says he was giving Khan problems is being silly. He was stopping Khan from landing cleanly, but mounted no attack of his own... is that really problematic? I wouldn't say that Kevin Johnson gave Vitali K problems, he just came to survive, same as Paul...
        yeah nice comparison, johnson was all defense against vitali.. mccloskey just wanted to survive.. i wonder if he even threw any punches in camp or just worked on defense...

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP