I dont see why people blame Khan, Mcloskey was DREADFULLY negative

[TheKza]

moccloskey was very negative, he made khan look bad but because he was so negative, khan won every round very very easily, khan also hurt him a couple of times

khan will still take out bradley, i was dissapointed in the tactics by roach, seemed like they were shocked at how mcloskey came out and fought

I think they're were expecting McCloskey to be offensive knowing that it would be his only shot at a world title. But he was negative beyond belief.
If he came to fight, Khan would have looked so much better.
Whether he beats Bradley or not, Khan will look 10 times better than he did against McCloskey. Styles make fights.

[T-97]

And the more reason I was surprise that people were calling for a rematch on here.

Some people are idiots, man, what more can you say...

[-Antonio-]

Khan won nearly every minute of every round against an awkward southpaw. There's not much else he could of done. people say he looked bad, I say they are nitpicking.

[Pullcounter]

He knew if he let his own hands go he would of been tasting leather, so he spoiled and fought to make it an ugly borefest. Being an awkward southpaw of decent ability makes this possible for him to do.

it was a bad clash of styles, but I dunno man... khan fights in a very amatuerish style.

Khan should've went to the body more and he should've used his jab and his feints a lot more.

[-Boxzilla-]

paul barely threw anything and his hands were down for most of the fight .... dunno how that can be considered all that negative