'undefeated' dont mean jack sh it

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nujabes77
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 8359
    • 535
    • 354
    • 16,443

    #1

    'undefeated' dont mean jack sh it

    berto losing to ortiz (2 losses)
    lopez losing to salido (5 losses)
    calderon losing to segura and so on...



    just love how members on here hype sh it up just cus their fighter is 'undefeated'



  • chiguy91
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 8865
    • 1,239
    • 1,515
    • 17,428

    #2
    dude, salido has like 11 losses, not 5

    Comment

    • johncods
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 7761
      • 421
      • 58
      • 14,300

      #3
      If you know boxing you know that an undefeated record comes with a lot of question marks. I mean just look at mayweather. He's supposed to be the greatest undefeated fighter today yet when you look at his resume it's pretty weak sauce compared to Pac or de la hoya or even shane mosley.

      For some reason tho a lot of people here especially floyd fans put so much emphasis on an " 0 ". And u notice they're the 1st to call anyone a bum, shot or whatever after a fighter loses.

      Comment

      • Khalid X
        The Truth *********
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 11976
        • 691
        • 531
        • 20,762

        #4
        Originally posted by pacman777
        berto losing to ortiz (2 losses)
        lopez losing to salido (5 losses)
        calderon losing to segura and so on...



        just love how members on here hype sh it up just cus their fighter is 'undefeated'



        That or having a title a long with a company like HBO hyping you up to be something your not.

        I've been watching boxing since I was 5, actually boxed myself, so I don't need some fans and network telling me who is good and who's not.

        I have eyes and like i've been saying, Berto just isn't that great to begin and I like how everything I've been saying actually comes true once he and fighters like him finally step up.

        Comment

        • Bushbaby
          Wild Apache
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 23513
          • 727
          • 370
          • 32,078

          #5
          Quite frankly,a loss can be quite a good thing for some fighters.It erases imaturity can help some fighters forget about being ****y.

          Comment

          • TOBYLEE1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 6824
            • 181
            • 49
            • 14,831

            #6
            If you are undefeated and faced the top oppossition it means something. But ppl hold on to an undefeated record like it is the do or die of the sport. When good fighters face good fighters they are bound to lose.

            But as recent most undefeated fighters do avoid the top of their division. they always claim if the money is right in order to not to take the fight

            Comment

            • Daddy T
              BigDaddy
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 5637
              • 198
              • 156
              • 12,260

              #7
              undefeated usually (but not always) means untested

              Comment

              • Uturn
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 7606
                • 522
                • 333
                • 15,969

                #8
                Having a '0' on the record is irrelevant these days, most will know you haven't tested the waters. Mayweather is the only exception really, although he is weaving his way out of a fight with pac.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP