Idea: Overturning Decisions Council.. The "Review Council"

[boxingking500]

i was thinking with all these "controversial, robbed, crappy" decisions, why dont the 4 alphabets.. create like a "Review Council" which is this is how it will go

Fighter A vs. Fighter B= Fighter a wins... split decision, highly controversial, some claim Fighter B was robbed

Fighter B wants the fight to be reviewed (say 2 days later, after the fight).... here comes the "Review Council", a group of maybe 5-7 judges.; odd number) if they accept.. they will "review the fight"... and they have the power to overturn wins, loses, decisions etc... they will judge the fight, talk over it with the other judges... and then they will come to a final decision (based on majority vote)

to see if the decision "stays" or is "overturned"...

that council has the power to "overturn" the decision of that fight, and can grant a victory for Fighter B, a draw... or whatever

a fighter has to ask for a "review council" within 7 days after the fight, or they cannot ask for a "Review Council"

after a week.. if a fighter does not ask for a "review council" the decision of the fight stands...

[ИATAS]

seems logical something like that should be in place.

I have a feeling some of that has to do with ********, as it would probably really create problems and whether or not people admit it ******** influences all major sports, from boxing to the NFL and so on (injury reports were made mandatory for NFL teams to release publicly specifically because of ********, for example).

[Heeb]

My problem with that is what if a fighter can complain about any decision and get fights overturned in which they clearly lost?