Why are they saying the want it on Sky Sports 1 as most people don't have Sky Sports 3? The number of people without SS3 is exactly the same at the number without SS1. Why does that matter so much? If you subscribe to SS then you get all SS channels. I remember in the past it was different where different packages got you different channels but now, correct me if im wrong, if you have SS then you have all SS channels. This sounds like a front for another issue at the moment.
I feel this is a much bigger blow for Khan than it is for Sky. Again, correct me if I'm wrong, but Khan's PPV no.s have been fairly poor so far (when not following a Warren Card e.g. "Gr8 Britain vs The World"). Khan is already a very wealthy young man, I don't get why he can't just bite the bullet and fight McCloskey on SS3 then rake it in against Bradley on PPV. He'll hurt his career more doing it this way.
I feel this is a much bigger blow for Khan than it is for Sky. Again, correct me if I'm wrong, but Khan's PPV no.s have been fairly poor so far (when not following a Warren Card e.g. "Gr8 Britain vs The World"). Khan is already a very wealthy young man, I don't get why he can't just bite the bullet and fight McCloskey on SS3 then rake it in against Bradley on PPV. He'll hurt his career more doing it this way.
Comment