Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Saul Alvarez: Morales Was Robbed, He Wins a Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
    By finish do you mean eeking out a ***ing victory you god damn mouthbreathing AIDS infested Island rat?
    lolololololo

    Comment


    • #22
      Anyone who saw the fight saw Canelo jumping up and down like a monkey when Morales was doing good and their both mexican so of course hes gonna be bias.

      Anyone who says Morales won needs to watch the fight with a pen and peice of paper and actually score the fight. Maidana threw over 400 more punches than Morales and completely shut one of Morales's eyes.

      It was a close fight and Morales is a true warrior but he lost. No way he wins a rematch either.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
        Of course the Reyna of La Isla de Ratones had to put in her two cents.
        lololololololol

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
          Anyone who saw the fight saw Canelo jumping up and down like a monkey when Morales was doing good and their both mexican so of course hes gonna be bias.

          Anyone who says Morales won needs to watch the fight with a pen and peice of paper and actually score the fight. Maidana threw over 400 more punches than Morales and completely shut one of Morales's eyes.

          It was a close fight and Morales is a true warrior but he lost. No way he wins a rematch either.
          Yes but punches on the arms and that hit thin air don't count.

          I had Morales by a round and a draw wouldn't have been too bad,...close fight no robbery but maidana did not win this convincingly. Both fighters impressed me Morales warrior spirit and el cheato.. sorry chino lols punch resistance..guy really is a mini terminator although did look clueless and very crude at some parts

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
            as a member of the B.Hop NSB defense team....I think its my duty to go in on this

            ladies and gents of the NSB jury...ever since B.Hop said some very ugly things to Calzaghe he's had to wear a certain label...this label doesn't allow him to speak on certain things without a backlash from a certain group of ppl....example

            Comments Thread For: Bernard Hopkins: Dirrell was robbed, He wins rematch.

            first poster: he said that cus Dirrell is black..he's such a racist

            second poster: Froch won that and B.Hop is a racist

            next poster: B.Hop can't stand to see a whiteboy beat a black

            these would be the ****** ass responses if the script was flipped like the example I gave...all hell would break loose...so ladies and gents of the jury, I want that ugly label thrown out and my dude acquitted and be exempt from further accusations regarding race because other fighters who show support for their fellow homeboys are not given the same label......and Carnelo is right and wrong....no robbery took place but I got EM winning a rematch if it happened
            If Calzaghe had said the racist things Hopkins said, then no, it wouldn't.

            Comment


            • #26
              It thought the fight was a narrow win to Maidana, although no one could have complained about a draw. Morales threw the much more accurate punches but Maidana just threw far more and finished stronger.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP