Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In what round would've Morales or Pac KO'd Peden

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Moon
    I might agree with somebody who says Peden was "never in the fight" with Barerra (like gayfist said). But, that doesn't mean that MAB shouldn't get credit for the win. If Peden had a bad night, or simply was outgunned by Barrera (for any reason) MAB deserves the credit for the win.

    When Pac destroyed and embarassed MAB over 11 rounds, it could easily be said that MAB was "never in he fight" and that was the reason Pac won. I don't buy that though. Pac deserves the win and all the credit, just like MAB deserves the IBF Belt and the credit for beating Peden.

    I agree that Pac's win over MAB is much bigger than MAB's win over Peden. The IBF Belt doesn't elevate MAB much, except that he is wise to create some bargaining power for his next fights. That's not ******, exspecially when your workplace is as dangerous as the ring, you must make the money now and make lots of it.

    Pac receives the highest praise from me for seeking the top-tier guys. It's so ****ing rare that ny fighter has balls enough and skills enough to do this. Look at Warren in the UK, he won't even let his fighters take-on the best guys, while pacis outthere seeking the most dangerous fighters. What's not to like about that? He's giving boxing fans everything they want.

    MAB, unlike Pac, is not giving fans the immediate rematch thast they want, but I'm not stressing, because it will come. All this talk of "chicken" and "sissy" is all bull**** and doesn't do anything to elevate your man Pac. The discussion right now should be Morales. If Pac gets through that rematch, then we know exactly where MAB will be. He'll be waiting for Pac. Any talk about "chicken" is ancient history and doesn't deserve much attention, really. Right now, Pac and MAB are lined-up for a rematch, if Pac can get there.
    Chicken is the right word when your taking years before you answer a challenge kid. That's common sense.

    Coward is the right word when at the time of the fight, while you were face to face with PAC, with you're face getting rearranged (the fight ended with MAB's face so violet and unrecognizable he had to wear glasses coz he has both black eyes. lol!), telling the world that it was a fair fight and THAT YOU HAVE NO EXCUSES! Pls take note of the word NO EXCUSES DUMMY.

    After several months, now that PAC is not in your face, you're saying it's an offnight? And you're insultig PAC by saying you don't fight leftovers? I would like COWARD MAB say that to PAC's face. But then again, that's the sign of cowards, they're only brave when you're not facing them. lol!

    Get that Canadian? lol!

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Pak men
      Chicken is the right word when your taking years before you answer a challenge kid. That's common sense.

      Coward is the right word when at the time of the fight, while you were face to face with PAC, with you're face getting rearranged (the fight ended with MAB's face so violet and unrecognizable he had to wear glasses coz he has both black eyes. lol!), telling the world that it was a fair fight and THAT YOU HAVE NO EXCUSES! Pls take note of the word NO EXCUSES DUMMY.

      After several months, now that PAC is not in your face, you're saying it's an offnight? And you're insultig PAC by saying you don't fight leftovers? I would like COWARD MAB say that to PAC's face. But then again, that's the sign of cowards, they're only brave when you're not facing them. lol!

      Get that Canadian? lol!
      Was this post meant to say something?

      You're saying that by admitting you "have no excuses", then you are a coward? That makes sense in what part of the world?

      And, it wasn't several months. MAB said in the post-fight interview that he "didn't feel like himself" and that his training camp was "distracted".

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Moon
        Was this post meant to say something?

        You're saying that by admitting you "have no excuses", then you are a coward? That makes sense in what part of the world?

        And, it wasn't several months. MAB said in the post-fight interview that he "didn't feel like himself" and that his training camp was "distracted".
        But the fact when after the fight, when he got his face rearranged, he said it was NO EXCUSES.

        Now they're not face to face he's saying he's not himself. Only cowards speak of off-nights when they're not face to face with the one who destroyed them.

        MAB is one of them.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Pak men
          Hey dummy! Ever heard of the news? Where were you? Hiding in your ass? The judges made a "MISTAKE" in the scorecard. Dummy. lol!
          you've got to be the biggest idiot on these boards. the question was what happened to pac's killer instinct in the marquez fight? since you don't care to address that let's address the scoring. scoring a round is a judgement call. e. steward had stated alot of judges won't score 10-6 rds. the only mistake was not dq'ing pac for hitting marquez when he was down (3rd kd). back to the scoring i gave pac a 10-6 rd 1 along w/rds 2 and i think 9 or 10. the remaing rds marquez dictated the fight and schooled your boy. score 114-111 marquez. if you really thought pac won why don't piss and moan about a marquez rematch like you do barrera? scared your boy will lose? get schooled again? or maybe that mysterious blister will rear it's ugly head again. you're a joke along with your observations.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by cdxx
            you've got to be the biggest idiot on these boards. the question was what happened to pac's killer instinct in the marquez fight? since you don't care to address that let's address the scoring. scoring a round is a judgement call. e. steward had stated alot of judges won't score 10-6 rds. the only mistake was not dq'ing pac for hitting marquez when he was down (3rd kd). back to the scoring i gave pac a 10-6 rd 1 along w/rds 2 and i think 9 or 10. the remaing rds marquez dictated the fight and schooled your boy. score 114-111 marquez. if you really thought pac won why don't piss and moan about a marquez rematch like you do barrera? scared your boy will lose? get schooled again? or maybe that mysterious blister will rear it's ugly head again. you're a joke along with your observations.
            Coming from another idiot like you kiddo, I don't mind. lol!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by cdxx
              you've got to be the biggest idiot on these boards. the question was what happened to pac's killer instinct in the marquez fight? since you don't care to address that let's address the scoring. scoring a round is a judgement call. e. steward had stated alot of judges won't score 10-6 rds. the only mistake was not dq'ing pac for hitting marquez when he was down (3rd kd). back to the scoring i gave pac a 10-6 rd 1 along w/rds 2 and i think 9 or 10. the remaing rds marquez dictated the fight and schooled your boy. score 114-111 marquez. if you really thought pac won why don't piss and moan about a marquez rematch like you do barrera? scared your boy will lose? get schooled again? or maybe that mysterious blister will rear it's ugly head again. you're a joke along with your observations.

              ANOTHA IDIOT!

              Alot of judges won't score 10-6 on 3 KDs??????!!!!! **** outa here moron. You jest typed a whole paragraph OF CRAP!

              Comment


              • #27
                Pac would have ktfo'd Peden in the 4th round. Morales in 5 rounds.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP