Yes, because boxing is a event per event case. Just like catchweights and glove size agreements.
My issue is how can anyone be against better testing. How is better testing bad for the sport? If protects fighters and levels the playing field evenly. How can anyone be against that?
Now if you really want to know whats not fair is winning titles at catch weights. cotto had to fight a fighter at a full weight limit like everyone else, but another fighter can fight for the same title by adjusting the weight limit to complement him. Thats BS....The 154 title was a disgrace and the ones that honor this 154 title are the same fans that are against better testing. This is the worst fans in history in my opinion.
My issue is how can anyone be against better testing. How is better testing bad for the sport? If protects fighters and levels the playing field evenly. How can anyone be against that?
Now if you really want to know whats not fair is winning titles at catch weights. cotto had to fight a fighter at a full weight limit like everyone else, but another fighter can fight for the same title by adjusting the weight limit to complement him. Thats BS....The 154 title was a disgrace and the ones that honor this 154 title are the same fans that are against better testing. This is the worst fans in history in my opinion.
Comment