Comments Thread For: Khan-Bradley Could Have Big Hurdles Over The Money

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #61
    Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
    Bradley needs to stand his ground, 50/50 Vegas fight or it don't happen, I knew money would be a problem, Khan is gonna ask for more because of the draw, so he can duck, In this case Bradley is the unified champ, he gets a 50/50 deal, flat out. The way HBO is ****ing him I would go back to showtime. He rolls Khans easy style, the dude just fought Alexander, but he is goin g to duck Khan? you if you believe that you are ignorant,
    If you believe Alexander is a more daunting prospect than Khan, you're ignorant

    Comment

    • SpitBalla
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Feb 2011
      • 840
      • 46
      • 0
      • 951

      #62
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      If you believe Alexander is a more daunting prospect than Khan, you're ignorant
      Seriously man. Alexander was at a complete loss in what to do against Kotelnik. And Khan owned Kotelnik. Only an idiot would think Alexander is on the same level as Khan.

      Alexander is nothing special in all honesty. I don't think his career is going anywhere, HBO has to do his next fight. But HBO want to distance themselves from Bradley and Alexander, no doubt about that.

      And this aint a US vs UK thing at all for me. I'm American, but give me a break. Khan kicks the **** out of Alexander 10 times out of 10.

      Comment

      • J Dubb II 330
        Call Me Nighthawk
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 1916
        • 89
        • 93
        • 8,461

        #63
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        If you believe Alexander is a more daunting prospect than Khan, you're ignorant
        Better all around boxer. There was a reason he was unified and number 2, when he fought Bradley, aside from that I don't entertain your posts, too biased. you ride englands **** to hard

        Comment

        • J Dubb II 330
          Call Me Nighthawk
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 1916
          • 89
          • 93
          • 8,461

          #64
          when people understand styles make fights, you will begin to understand boxing more, Alexander outworked Kotelnik, control the pace and had ring generalship, that's why he won the fight. Khan has shown me nothing. watch the Bradley - Alexander fight again

          Comment

          • SpitBalla
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Feb 2011
            • 840
            • 46
            • 0
            • 951

            #65
            Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
            Better all around boxer. There was a reason he was unified and number 2, when he fought Bradley, aside from that I don't entertain your posts, too biased. you ride englands **** to hard
            Are you mentally handicapped?

            You seriously think Alexander is a better all around boxer than Khan? Really? Even though Alexander had to have a home crowd to beat Kotelnik, while Khan handeled him easily?

            If you're not mentally handicapped than you're the one that rides Americas **** to the point you make yourself look like a dumbass.

            Comment

            • SCtrojansbaby
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 5951
              • 136
              • 72
              • 12,653

              #66
              WTF money? Bradley doesn't draw a soul to his fights live or on tv. If Khan wants an 80/20 purse split Bradley should take it.

              Comment

              • J Dubb II 330
                Call Me Nighthawk
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 1916
                • 89
                • 93
                • 8,461

                #67
                Originally posted by SpitBalla
                Are you mentally handicapped?

                You seriously think Alexander is a better all around boxer than Khan? Really? Even though Alexander had to have a home crowd to beat Kotelnik, while Khan handeled him easily?

                If you're not mentally handicapped than you're the one that rides Americas **** to the point you make yourself look like a dumbass.
                your basing this off.one fight, your reply was ignorant and proved nothing

                Comment

                • SpitBalla
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 840
                  • 46
                  • 0
                  • 951

                  #68
                  Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
                  when people understand styles make fights, you will begin to understand boxing more, Alexander outworked Kotelnik, control the pace and had ring generalship, that's why he won the fight. Khan has shown me nothing. watch the Bradley - Alexander fight again
                  I wait I got it. You are mentally handicapped, if you think Bradley - Alexander is a good advertisement for Alexander. In case you didn't realise, prematurely quitting a fight is not a good sign. And anyway, Alexander was losing EVERY SINGLE round to Bradley.

                  This is seriously one of the single DUMBEST posts I have encountered on the net. Shocking assnine. Insanely ******. You should really be ashamed of yourself.

                  Comment

                  • SpitBalla
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 840
                    • 46
                    • 0
                    • 951

                    #69
                    Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
                    your basing this off.one fight, your reply was ignorant and proved nothing
                    Yes, and why possibly would I choose Kotelnik? Think a little. Could it be because both Khan and Alexander fought him? Therefore, it is the most relevant point of comparison, and in this case Khan humiliates and shame Alexanders performance.

                    And its not one performance, Alexander looked like dog **** against Bradley. He has no credibility or goodwill left.

                    You can call people ignorant all you want, but you cannot even write basic English, and you are quite clearly mentally ******ed. So I'm probably being harsh on you.

                    Comment

                    • choelzle
                      Contender
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 216
                      • 13
                      • 21
                      • 6,289

                      #70
                      Originally posted by SpitBalla
                      Are you mentally handicapped?

                      You seriously think Alexander is a better all around boxer than Khan? Really? Even though Alexander had to have a home crowd to beat Kotelnik, while Khan handeled him easily?

                      If you're not mentally handicapped than you're the one that rides Americas **** to the point you make yourself look like a dumbass.
                      Are You serious? Khan has hand speed and he circles the perimeter of the ring...what other all around skills does he have? He cant counter punch because he wont stand in there and he retreats and loses control of entire rounds. Alexander slides, moves laterally, controls fights with his jab, and can counter with either hand...you Might think that Khan has more talent than Alexander...but overall boxing skills are even comparable...not even worth speaking another word about

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP