Better win over Juan Diaz, Nate Campbell or JMM?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scott9945
    Gonna be more su****ious
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 22032
    • 741
    • 1,371
    • 30,075

    #11
    Campbell was giving Diaz a pretty good beating late in that fight. He is a clear choice to me.

    Comment

    • -Kev-
      this is boxing
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 39914
      • 5,025
      • 1,447
      • 234,543

      #12
      Campbell was the first boxer to beat Diaz, that, no matter how he did it should already trump Marquez's wins.

      But, Marquez was only the 2nd boxer to beat Diaz, and the first to knock him out, and I honestly don't think any one else will knock Diaz out any time soon.

      BTW it's not fair to compare how many punches they landed, because Marquez only went 8 and a half rounds with Diaz while Campbell went all 12. So who knows how many punches Marquez was gonna land in 12 rounds at the pace that fight was heading.

      Comment

      • ThePunchingBag
        Rolling with the punches.
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 5766
        • 192
        • 55
        • 12,300

        #13
        Better win?

        Nate.

        More Impressive?

        Marquez, but if I remember correctly he got rocked a few times by a pillow fisted fighter, so that drops the impressive factor a bit.

        Comment

        • Steak
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2006
          • 10713
          • 509
          • 268
          • 17,902

          #14
          Originally posted by The Gambler1981
          Campbell beat the better version, JMM did it more impressively
          That seems like a pretty fair assessment.

          Comment

          • lefthook2daliva
            huh?
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 5569
            • 190
            • 594
            • 18,317

            #15
            I think you gotta' give it to Campbell:

            1) He was the first fighter to beat Diaz.

            2) He went right into Diaz' wheelhouse and whupped him in front of his crew.


            Both were great fights and props to JD for great efforts in both.

            Comment

            • Walt Liquor
              the opposite of pure
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 21667
              • 913
              • 1,369
              • 40,313

              #16
              Originally posted by lefthook2daliva
              I think you gotta' give it to Campbell:

              1) He was the first fighter to beat Diaz.

              2) He went right into Diaz' wheelhouse and whupped him in front of his crew.


              Both were great fights and props to JD for great efforts in both.
              agreed^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

              Comment

              • Rab-
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2010
                • 1079
                • 107
                • 12
                • 1,418

                #17
                I give it to Nate.

                Comment

                • Cuauhtémoc1520
                  Head Mexican in Charge
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 20824
                  • 1,666
                  • 569
                  • 35,996

                  #18
                  Definitely Nate because he stopped a buzz saw at the time in Diaz.

                  Marquez just showed the difference in class between him and Diaz. Diaz is a really good fighter, JMM is an ATG.

                  Comment

                  • Dagomba
                    Campeón Gallo
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 1939
                    • 139
                    • 112
                    • 9,683

                    #19
                    That was Marquez' second fight at lightweight and to knock Diaz out seems more impressive from a guy with almost no experience at 135. Rocking Marquez is not impressive and irrelevant. Even knocking him down doesn't guarantee that you are going to beat him.

                    Campbell's only edge is that he beat him while being undefeated so if we talk about better I think Campbell fought the better version for 6 or 7 rounds.

                    Comment

                    • Aut_72
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 344
                      • 11
                      • 1
                      • 6,428

                      #20
                      Originally posted by -Kev-
                      Campbell was the first boxer to beat Diaz, that, no matter how he did it should already trump Marquez's wins.

                      But, Marquez was only the 2nd boxer to beat Diaz, and the first to knock him out, and I honestly don't think any one else will knock Diaz out any time soon.

                      BTW it's not fair to compare how many punches they landed, because Marquez only went 8 and a half rounds with Diaz while Campbell went all 12. So who knows how many punches Marquez was gonna land in 12 rounds at the pace that fight was heading.
                      ^^Paulie Malignaggi beat him before Marquez (Two times in my books) but gotta agree with that

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP