are you saying hopkins literally landed 1 punch cause that's just flat out wrong. there is no mythical standard of how many punches you need to land to win a round. all you have to do is be better than your opponent and hopkins was.
you could say calzaghe literally landed 1 punch in a couple rounds because i counted and he literally landed 1 clean punch in some of the rounds. go and look at the replays. of course some of the judges gave him these rounds anyway even when hopkins outlanded him by a huge margin but meh who cares.
lol. No. Calm down. I never mentioned Hopkins or Calzaghe in those posts.
The discussion had moved on to scoring.
What are you afraid of? It's not Cowardzaghes video. He just takes the fight and does slow motion on all of hopkins AND joe's connects.
The slow motion is very helpful. Just stop being scared and watch it. If you don't agree with it fine but it's very damning slow motion visual evidence.
Only problem is in real life the fight wasn't in slow motion, I have already seen it, it was a **** fight and I don't care to watch it again.
Yeah and? Douglas beat the count, who is debating anything other than a few butthurt Mike fans just like a few butthurt B-hop fans who scored all of the holding he did as reasons for why he beat Joe.
But this falls under an asthetic and entertainment value. Which as you stated has nothign to do with who won the fight.
The better question is: the guy who is landing one punch per round, going backword and clinching....why can't the other guy HIT HIM MORE THAN ONCE PER ROUND?
Just a thought.
He cant hit him because he is being hugged and run away from.
Hypothetically, if a weak wristed guy with fast hands lands one light punch then runs away and clinches the rest of the fight, whilst the better fighter attempts to land better quality punches, but every time gets clinched....
One is attempting to fight, whilst the other is not. Not sure if i could score the round for the runner. Even though he landed the clean punch.
Comment