On the scorecards Froch-Pascal was a near shut out

[-Kev-]

Froch-Pascal:

Herminio Cuevas Collazo 117-111 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 118-110[What??? ]. If any of you saw Froch-Pascal you know these scores are laughable.

The fight I saw 3 years ago was way closer than that.

Then you have the controversial Froch-Dirrell robbery.

Both of these ridiculous outcomes took place in Nottingham.

I bring this up, to remind Showtime, if they're reading this, please no more fights in Nottingham!

[jrosales13]

Froch-Pascal:

Herminio Cuevas Collazo 117-111 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 118-110[What??? ]. If any of you saw Froch-Pascal you know these scores are laughable.

The fight I saw 3 years ago was way closer than that.

Then you have the controversial Froch-Dirrell robbery.

Both of these ridiculous outcomes took place in Nottingham.

I bring this up, to remind Showtime, if they're reading this, please no more fights in Nottingham!

Sigh

[adamk1304]

I don't know how anyone can attempt to defend Andre Dirrell. He fought like an absolute b***h against Froch and faked an injury to earn a DQ win against Abraham. Tim Bradley won a decision in Nottingham, he could have easily been robbed but wasn't. Dirrel lost because he ran around the ring for 36 minutes, and Pascal was beaten clearly.

[SlickTurtle]

Froch-Pascal:

Herminio Cuevas Collazo 117-111 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 118-110[What??? ]. If any of you saw Froch-Pascal you know these scores are laughable.

The fight I saw 3 years ago was way closer than that.

Then you have the controversial Froch-Dirrell robbery.

Both of these ridiculous outcomes took place in Nottingham.

I bring this up, to remind Showtime, if they're reading this, please no more fights in Nottingham!

isn't he the same douchebag who had Oscar winning against Mayweather?

and the Froch-Dirrell was a very close fight.. wouldn't call it a robbery

[SlickTurtle]

I don't know how anyone can attempt to defend Andre Dirrell. He fought like an absolute b***h against Froch and faked an injury to earn a DQ win against Abraham. Tim Bradley won a decision in Nottingham, he could have easily been robbed but wasn't. Dirrel lost because he ran around the ring for 36 minutes, and Pascal was beaten clearly.

He was clearly beaten in a 7-5, 8-4 type of fight. Not 10-2.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Froch clearly beat Pascal.

***** thread.

[daggum]

I don't know how anyone can attempt to defend Andre Dirrell. He fought like an absolute b***h against Froch and faked an injury to earn a DQ win against Abraham. Tim Bradley won a decision in Nottingham, he could have easily been robbed but wasn't. Dirrel lost because he ran around the ring for 36 minutes, and Pascal was beaten clearly.

yeah but look at those scorecards. bradley dominated the fight and he only won by 1 point. hometown crowds influence judges immensely. people should know this by now.

[-Kev-]

Froch clearly beat Pascal.

***** thread.

Did I say Pascal was robbed?

So because you win a fight, no matter how many rounds your opponent won, you get 120-108.

[-Kev-]

DLH-Trinidad wasn't a robbery for Jro either, of course Dirrell-Froch isn't going to be a robbery for a guy like that. Even worse, he thought Trinidad actually won.

[-Kev-]

He was clearly beaten in a 7-5, 8-4 type of fight. Not 10-2.

I don't know why people defend scorecards just because the right fighter won.

118-110/117-111 was not the Froch-Pascal fight I saw.

For example: Cotto clearly beat Malignaggi..doesn't mean Cotto should get a 120-108 scorecard, which he didn't get, it's just an example.