On the scorecards Froch-Pascal was a near shut out

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39960
    • 5,045
    • 1,449
    • 234,543

    #1

    On the scorecards Froch-Pascal was a near shut out

    Froch-Pascal:

    Herminio Cuevas Collazo 117-111 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 118-110[What??? ]. If any of you saw Froch-Pascal you know these scores are laughable.

    The fight I saw 3 years ago was way closer than that.

    Then you have the controversial Froch-Dirrell robbery.

    Both of these ridiculous outcomes took place in Nottingham.

    I bring this up, to remind Showtime, if they're reading this, please no more fights in Nottingham!
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 739
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #2
    Originally posted by -Kev-
    Froch-Pascal:

    Herminio Cuevas Collazo 117-111 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 118-110[What??? ]. If any of you saw Froch-Pascal you know these scores are laughable.

    The fight I saw 3 years ago was way closer than that.

    Then you have the controversial Froch-Dirrell robbery.

    Both of these ridiculous outcomes took place in Nottingham.

    I bring this up, to remind Showtime, if they're reading this, please no more fights in Nottingham!
    Sigh



    Comment

    • adamk1304
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2006
      • 2000
      • 104
      • 24
      • 8,548

      #3
      I don't know how anyone can attempt to defend Andre Dirrell. He fought like an absolute b***h against Froch and faked an injury to earn a DQ win against Abraham. Tim Bradley won a decision in Nottingham, he could have easily been robbed but wasn't. Dirrel lost because he ran around the ring for 36 minutes, and Pascal was beaten clearly.

      Comment

      • SlickTurtle
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 503
        • 67
        • 59
        • 6,846

        #4
        Originally posted by -Kev-
        Froch-Pascal:

        Herminio Cuevas Collazo 117-111 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 118-110[What??? ]. If any of you saw Froch-Pascal you know these scores are laughable.

        The fight I saw 3 years ago was way closer than that.

        Then you have the controversial Froch-Dirrell robbery.

        Both of these ridiculous outcomes took place in Nottingham.

        I bring this up, to remind Showtime, if they're reading this, please no more fights in Nottingham!
        isn't he the same douchebag who had Oscar winning against Mayweather?

        and the Froch-Dirrell was a very close fight.. wouldn't call it a robbery
        Last edited by SlickTurtle; 04-02-2011, 07:26 PM.

        Comment

        • SlickTurtle
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 503
          • 67
          • 59
          • 6,846

          #5
          Originally posted by adamk1304
          I don't know how anyone can attempt to defend Andre Dirrell. He fought like an absolute b***h against Froch and faked an injury to earn a DQ win against Abraham. Tim Bradley won a decision in Nottingham, he could have easily been robbed but wasn't. Dirrel lost because he ran around the ring for 36 minutes, and Pascal was beaten clearly.
          He was clearly beaten in a 7-5, 8-4 type of fight. Not 10-2.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #6
            Froch clearly beat Pascal.

            ***** thread.

            Comment

            • daggum
              All time great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 43783
              • 4,690
              • 3
              • 166,270

              #7
              Originally posted by adamk1304
              I don't know how anyone can attempt to defend Andre Dirrell. He fought like an absolute b***h against Froch and faked an injury to earn a DQ win against Abraham. Tim Bradley won a decision in Nottingham, he could have easily been robbed but wasn't. Dirrel lost because he ran around the ring for 36 minutes, and Pascal was beaten clearly.
              yeah but look at those scorecards. bradley dominated the fight and he only won by 1 point. hometown crowds influence judges immensely. people should know this by now.

              Comment

              • -Kev-
                this is boxing
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 39960
                • 5,045
                • 1,449
                • 234,543

                #8
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                Froch clearly beat Pascal.

                ***** thread.
                Did I say Pascal was robbed?

                So because you win a fight, no matter how many rounds your opponent won, you get 120-108.

                Comment

                • -Kev-
                  this is boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 39960
                  • 5,045
                  • 1,449
                  • 234,543

                  #9
                  DLH-Trinidad wasn't a robbery for Jro either, of course Dirrell-Froch isn't going to be a robbery for a guy like that. Even worse, he thought Trinidad actually won.

                  Comment

                  • -Kev-
                    this is boxing
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 39960
                    • 5,045
                    • 1,449
                    • 234,543

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SlickTurtle
                    He was clearly beaten in a 7-5, 8-4 type of fight. Not 10-2.
                    I don't know why people defend scorecards just because the right fighter won.

                    118-110/117-111 was not the Froch-Pascal fight I saw.

                    For example: Cotto clearly beat Malignaggi..doesn't mean Cotto should get a 120-108 scorecard, which he didn't get, it's just an example.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP