-
-
Comment
-
inbox..... exposed as a lame ***wit
You truly are a lame ***go7 kid.....
You did not let the side down, you funny excitable animated little turd
It truly amuses me that you could sit there whining like a little b1tch while I shred 27%'s JMW campaign and two best recent opponents.
Also ****head, I guess you missed this post.....
Huh? What was that ?Ya fkn dumb kid.
That saying is a hyperbole, it suggests that your money will work better for you if it is sitting in your pocket, rather than somebody else's. The Robert Jones school of business does not suggest that you incur legal action, or default..... it just lightheartedly suggests that, what is one or two statutory demands between friends?
You lame ***go7s are full of **** for nit-picking straws and for losing sleep over another man's finances. Pac-whores are truly the lowest sporting fans in the world.
Hence their low standards.
Hence their acceptance of 27%'s JMW title.
Don't be so ****** kid.
Well, I wasn't sure, so I rang around.....
I got some funny sounding kid on the phone, at first he thought that I was calling from WADA, so he repeatedly hung up..... but once I convinced him that I just wanted some business advice, he was most happy to help.
He told me..... ALWAYS TAKE THE MONEY !!
" Yay..... Osky like me..... me take money..... me smart"
LMAO
Comment
-
Alibata, this is an adult conversation.....
You made a statement about Cotto.
I replied to your statement and shredded it in front of your eyes.
Now all you can do is repeatedly respond with lame youtube vids ?
If you are not interested in boxing, then fine..... *** off ^^
Otherwise, answer this.....
Miguel Cotto.....
When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.
Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.
Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.
Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....
"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.
But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.
Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."
Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.
A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame
Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.
But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
Catch-weights.....
There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....
1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight
2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage
Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.
The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.
Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.
What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be
Comment
-
Not sure if anyone is still here or not ?
If one poster replies, I will do a quick breakdown on Parts 1-3, then do Part 4
Comment
-
LOL
I will nominate Leaduppercut this year to the Hall of Infamy in NSB, i guess he has a very good chance of joining yesir and mic in the list.
Mabrook!
Comment
Tweet
Comment