Will Hopkins take the Pacquiao route and sue Pascal for steroid use accusations?

[-Kev-]

Jean Pascal is doing 10x worse what GBP/Roger/Sr did by outright screaming "cheater" at Hopkins and telling him to take the test, saying he's on steroids. This is also on video.

So is it like Bernard Hopkins to sue, or is he just going to shut Pascal up in the ring?

And what do you think, should Hopkins sue?

I honestly think he's not gonna waste his time suing, that's just not like him.

[Rassclot]

lol is hopkins a brand?


what sponsorship money is he losing due to the defamation?

[Spray_resistant]

He should just ignore him and beat up worse than he did last time.

[ThatHaitiankid]

benard isnt as sensitive as pac so i think no

[| THE KING |]

Different circumstances.. especially when you have Pascal taking back what he said the very next press conference saying that he's not accusing B-Hop to be on anything..

Mayweathers have been talking shit for years now...

Also, B-Hop got Pascal to fight.. Pacquiao has yet to get Mayweather to fight.

[-Kev-]

lol is hopkins a brand?


what sponsorship money is he losing due to the defamation?

Do you have to be a brand to sue for defamation you dumbass?

Defamation per se

The four (4) categories of slander that are actionable per se are (i) accusing someone of a crime; (ii) alleging that someone has a foul or loathsome disease; (iii) adversely reflecting on a person’s fitness to conduct their business or trade; and (iv) im*****g serious sexual misconduct. Here again, the plaintiff need only prove that someone had published the statement to any third party. No proof of special damages is required.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#United_States

[brick wall]

if after bhop whoops his ass and pascal still continues with his accusations or claim something like he lost because bhop is on peds then for sure he'll get his day in court.

[| THE KING |]

if after bhop whoops his ass and pascal still continues with his accusations or claim something like he lost because bhop is on peds then for sure he'll get his day in court.

Agreed.. but Pascal killed that noise real quick.. he denied it shortly after the press conference, when asked if he was accusing B-Hop to be on any type of PEDs.

[Rassclot]

Do you have to be a brand to sue for defamation you dumbass?

Defamation per se

The four (4) categories of slander that are actionable per se are (i) accusing someone of a crime; (ii) alleging that someone has a foul or loathsome disease; (iii) adversely reflecting on a person’s fitness to conduct their business or trade; and (iv) im*****g serious sexual misconduct. Here again, the plaintiff need only prove that someone had published the statement to any third party. No proof of special damages is required.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#United_States

so i can technically sue you for calling me a dumb ass right?


now, how far will that lawsuit go in reality?


get out of your mother's basement for a second ya f@ggot.

[brick wall]

Agreed.. but Pascal killed that noise real quick.. he denied it shortly after the press conference, when asked if he was accusing B-Hop to be on any type of PEDs.

pascal probably saw the video of bhop talking about how 2 of his lawyers were in the building and witnessed everything pascal did that's why he pulled back.
i don't understand why some people are acting like it's ok to make accusations but it's not ok to sue your accuser. that's a ******ed way of thinking.