While it could easily be looked at as a biased video to "prove" Manny lost, I think it does a better job (win or lose) in showing how HBO commentary and biased can sway the general opinion. I didn't watch the fight from beginning to end right away, but I walked away thinking "Man Pacman beat Bradley up all night and was robbed"
But then when you really watch closely, in detail, see Bradley's face compared to Mosley, Cotto, Margarito, etc...you see that he looks clean as a whistle having just faced a vicious (2X the power) puncher who lands every left and right clean on the jaw
You also see how they go crazy when Pacman opens fire whether he's landing or not...however don't care to mention ANYTHING Bradley does well...instead they use that time to hype up Pacman.
I am not saying Bradley won...Pacman was active in a lot of spots and gives the appearance of effectiveness...but clearly against a fighter like Marquez and Bradley...when you move your head and counter, you have success...I think Pacman beat them based on simply being more active vs dominant.
But then when you really watch closely, in detail, see Bradley's face compared to Mosley, Cotto, Margarito, etc...you see that he looks clean as a whistle having just faced a vicious (2X the power) puncher who lands every left and right clean on the jaw
You also see how they go crazy when Pacman opens fire whether he's landing or not...however don't care to mention ANYTHING Bradley does well...instead they use that time to hype up Pacman.
I am not saying Bradley won...Pacman was active in a lot of spots and gives the appearance of effectiveness...but clearly against a fighter like Marquez and Bradley...when you move your head and counter, you have success...I think Pacman beat them based on simply being more active vs dominant.
Comment