Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[miron_lang]

Including Marquez he lost less than 8 rounds total.

From Diaz to Mosley

Cotto won 2 rounds at most
JMM won 5 rounds at most

the rest didnt a win a single round

Diaz, DLH, Hatton, Margarito, Clottey, Mosley. .. These guys didnt win a single round againts the small Pacquiao.

[hugh grant]

Its like people hear one person say he didnt look good, and then its like a chain reaction parrots repeating it.

SRR had competitve fights with him ending up ko'ing his opponents, and i bet SRR didnt get he didnt look good comments, just cos the fight was exciting and SRRs opponent tried to fight back but the bravery wasnt quite enough. Even though SRR wasnt as dominant he wasnt criticised, so theres something about Pac where the standard and bar is maybe a little higher.

Theres something fishy going on here.

[jai mari078]

Bradley can mad dog and try and act hard all he wants not gonna change the fact that he's gonna get beat.

Bradley is actin like Manny has never seen this before, and he's gonna intimidate him lol!

[megadeth]

Ask yourself, how many rounds has Manny lost in the last 3 and a half years?

I doubt Bradley will win, but I can see people discrediting Bradley's win by saying "Oh, Pac hasn't looked good as of late".

Besides his last 2 fights with Marquez, I don't think Pac has lost more than 2 rounds in the last 3-4 years. I doubt it will happen, but if Bradley wins, let's give him his just due.

None of that Pac hasn't looked good lately stuff.

If you are asking that, you also who has he fought?? Almost everyone that he's has fought in the last 3 1/2 years, other than Marquez, has been either taylor made for him, looked terrible in the recent fights, at a catch weight or 3/4 shot. To be honest, there is no reason that he should've been losing a lot of rounds against the guys he has fought. He is faster, a bigger puncher, and has better stamina than almost all of them.

What you should be asking yourself is how he could possibly lose so many rounds to a 38 year old Marquez, who he dragged up to 147, when he and his own team says he is a natural Jr. Middleweight.

Regardless, Bradley should get full credit if he beats Pac, especially convincingly. Pac should get full credit for beating Bradley if he wins as well.

[hugh grant]

If you are asking that, you also who has he fought?? Almost everyone that he's has fought in the last 3 1/2 years, other than Marquez, has been either taylor made for him, looked terrible in the recent fights, at a catch weight or 3/4 shot. To be honest, there is no reason that he should've been losing a lot of rounds against the guys he has fought. He is faster, a bigger puncher, and has better stamina than almost all of them.

What you should be asking yourself is how he could possibly lose so many rounds to a 38 year old Marquez, who he dragged up to 147, when he and his own team says he is a natural Jr. Middleweight.

Regardless, Bradley should get full credit if he beats Pac, especially convincingly. Pac should get full credit for beating Bradley if he wins as well.

So what you are doing here is dissing every pro fighter, saying they are tailor made for Pac, and rather than give Pac credit for having the ability to make people to order for him.
Are you saying JMM is the only boxer in the world can trouble Pac that is essientially what you are saying and if yes, Pac shouldnt be downgraded just cos one man on earth can trouble Pac.? Cotto is a nightmare for anyone as is hatton and all the others, but to Pac they are seen as made to order. Clottey lost a controversial decision to Cotto, does that then mean he isnt supposed to win rounds against Pac in your world he wins rounds against everyone else does Clottey?

Even if your the best, like Pac, he is still human and you expect even the best to lose many rounds when you got 2 pros in the ring. And if he dont lose many rounds, dont say he didnt perform well.

[Bushbaby]

I'd be genuinely surprised & pleased for Pacman if he wins this.

[noStylez]

If you are asking that, you also who has he fought?? Almost everyone that he's has fought in the last 3 1/2 years, other than Marquez, has been either taylor made for him, looked terrible in the recent fights, at a catch weight or 3/4 shot. To be honest, there is no reason that he should've been losing a lot of rounds against the guys he has fought. He is faster, a bigger puncher, and has better stamina than almost all of them.

What you should be asking yourself is how he could possibly lose so many rounds to a 38 year old Marquez, who he dragged up to 147, when he and his own team says he is a natural Jr. Middleweight.

Regardless, Bradley should get full credit if he beats Pac, especially convincingly. Pac should get full credit for beating Bradley if he wins as well.

No, I really think he just asked how many rounds Manny has lost the past 3 years.

Other than that, what you said "tailor made", makes boxing sound like it's WWE. If I had your sense I would have put my house on every single fight and then some.

[D4thincarnation]

I'd be genuinely surprised & pleased for Pacman if he wins this.

It don't take much to surprise you then.

[Bushbaby]

It don't take much to surprise you then.

Not true, I was also genuinely surprised that he even took the fight. Considering his trend of fights leading up.

[D4thincarnation]

Not true, I was also genuinely surprised that he even took the fight. Considering his trend of fights leading up.

Like I said it don't take much.

Maybe you need to get out more, if minor events surprise you.