thinking of mosley's losses...all of those guys had great jabs. i dont consider pacquiao to have a great jab, or even a good one. for that reason alone, i think mosley has a better chance in this fight
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
does sugar have a better chance to beat manny than he did to beat mayweather
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
A small percentage higher maybe? I think Shane will connect more against Manny. So there is still a big possibility that Sugar can devastate Pac with a haymaker...
BUT
...I also think Manny will connect more against Shane than Floyd did. Shane has a higher chance of being stopped by Manny.Last edited by Mega Eggot; 03-31-2011, 02:24 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mega Eggot View PostI small percentage higher maybe? I think Shane will connect more against Manny. So there is still a big possibility that Sugar can devastate Pac with a haymaker...
BUT
...I also think Manny will connect more against Shane than Floyd did. Shane has a higher chance of being stopped by Manny.
Landing 44% on a guy like Shane Mosley, is not an easy task. 30% of your punches landed is already above average. 208 of 477, that was target practice for Mayweather.
Pacquiao threw 1,200+ punches on Joshua Clottey and only landed 20%[246 of 1,231], on a guy who literally stands right in front of you. Mayweather landed on Mosley almost the amount Pacquiao landed on Clottey, but Pacquiao needed 754 more punches to do it. That is horrible aim. While Clottey landed 27% of his punches on Pacquiao, 108 of 399. Pacquiao not only has horrible accuracy, he's very easy to hit. But lucky for him, he caught Mosley at the tail end of his career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostPacquiao certainly throws more punches than Floyd and that's why he lands more than Floyd on common opponents. But as far as connecting goes, Mayweather is the far superior accurate boxer of the 2.
Landing 44% on a guy like Shane Mosley, is not an easy task. 30% of your punches landed is already above average. 208 of 477, that was target practice for Mayweather.
Pacquiao threw 1,200+ punches on Joshua Clottey and only landed 20%[246 of 1,231], on a guy who literally stands right in front of you. Mayweather landed on Mosley almost the amount Pacquiao landed on Clottey, but Pacquiao needed 754 more punches to do it. That is horrible aim. While Clottey landed 27% of his punches on Pacquiao, 108 of 399. Pacquiao not only has horrible accuracy, he's very easy to hit. But lucky for him, he caught Mosley at the tail end of his career.Last edited by Mega Eggot; 03-31-2011, 02:37 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mega Eggot View PostThere's really not much else to add after the bold. Punches landed is punches landed. They still hurt. Punches missed and punches NOT thrown....don't hurt.
There is not a big disparity on punches landed on common opponents anyways, except for Marquez. Mayweather landed 59%, 290 punches out 400+ thrown, while Pacquiao threw 600+ and only landed 150+. Every other common opponent they landed just about the same while Mayweather throws way less to get there.
Comment
Comment