Why Didnt Pac Ever Test For Other Fights?

**Twako** · 03-30-2011, 10:53 AM

why didnt floyd require a test in his 40 other fights?

**DLT** · 03-30-2011, 10:57 AM

Originally posted by Twako

why didnt floyd require a test in his 40 other fights?

you might could argue that but I do think its a legit thing if you think someone is cheating. He never suspected that of his other opponents but Pac is doing things that you rarely see. He also was at the 1st Morlaes fight so it shocks him to see Pac moving up & crushing guys, not to mentiong his dad & brother are telling him non stop that what Pac is doing is not normal and he has to be on something

**$Bullsfam$** · 03-30-2011, 11:01 AM

Because Clottey, Mosley, and Margarito just want to ****in fight and don't care about all the other BS. Unlike Floyd who's always trying to BS somebody.

And your being fair is pretty questionable as well. You totally took offense to "Cotto has had a great legacy then floyd" thread as if somebody just insulted your family. The TS was delusional in that thread but for the most part the Cotto fans made some pretty damn good points.

NOBODY was saying Cotto is or ever will be a better fighter. Talent wise he's on a whole other level but you defended it that way as if somebody picked on your little brother or something.

Truth is, Cotto has stepped up and fought the harder competition at welterweight enhancing is legacy to one of a true warrior. Floyd may have beaten the better fighters under 147, but when it came to fighting the best welterweights in his weight class he simply refused. He could have fought Cotto before or after he picked apart Mosley. He could have fought Margarito anytime before he fought Mosley. But no Floyd "retired on top" which is BS because Margarito & Cotto were prime then and were the #1 & #2 welterweights in the world at the time.

He got lucky and Magarito may have cheated when he trashed Cotto so he was allowed to kill 2 birds with one stones but that still hurts his legacy since he won't even fight Pac. He rather bet on basketball games.

**jpunieves** · 03-30-2011, 11:03 AM

Originally posted by DLT

This is a real question so please leave the junk at the door. Those on here who no me no that Im a Floyd fan but Im fair. I can see the argument on both sides but my 1 question is that if Pac agreed to the 14 days and the Floyd fight never happened, then why didnt he use it for his subsequent fights to see if he could get use to it and make the fight happened?

I say this because Pac has fought some good guys in Clottey, Margarito, and now Mosley but lets be real, those guys were never ever going to beat him barring some miracle. Therefore, why not use the 14day cutoff for the Clottey fight, then 7 day cutoff for the Margarito fight, then same day or 2 day cutoff for the Mosley fight and by then Pac is definitely use to the testing and Floyd has no excuse left.

He wasnt going to lose those fights and they said they would take the 14 days so stick by that and use it against guys you know you can beat. Not only that but it would make the media & public after the Clottey fight say that Pac is doing 14 days right now, why cant Floyd do that and they would say more after other fights.

I just always felt that Roach and those guys shouldve done that, e****ally with him fighting known cheats like Margarito & Mosley. It wouldve been a very good look and Floyd would have nothing to say or nowhere to run. Then the lawsuit also has more legs because Pac is openly testing.

Again, leave the hate comments at the door and hear some real responses

real responses are only for real accounts...get a life, alt...

read you posts 10x before you go to sleep and ponder why posters like you do not get respect.

**johncods** · 03-30-2011, 11:03 AM

Originally posted by DLT

you might could argue that but I do think its a legit thing if you think someone is cheating. He never suspected that of his other opponents but Pac is doing things that you rarely see. He also was at the 1st Morlaes fight so it shocks him to see Pac moving up & crushing guys, not to mentiong his dad & brother are telling him non stop that what Pac is doing is not normal and he has to be on something

Yet you just claimed that all of pac's opponents had no chance and pac's cherry picking. Then what's so rare about beating opponents you should be beating?

**DLT** · 03-30-2011, 11:07 AM

Originally posted by Natedatpkid

Because Clottey, Mosley, and Margarito just want to ****in fight and don't care about all the other BS. Unlike Floyd who's always trying to BS somebody.

And your being fair is pretty questionable as well. You totally took offense to "Cotto has had a great legacy then floyd" thread as if somebody just insulted your family. The TS was delusional in that thread but for the most part the Cotto fans made some pretty damn good points.

NOBODY was saying Cotto is or ever will be a better fighter. Talent wise he's on a whole other level but you defended it that way as if somebody picked on your little brother or something.

Truth is, Cotto has stepped up and fought the harder competition at welterweight enhancing is legacy to one of a true warrior. Floyd may have beaten the better fighters under 147, but when it came to fighting the best welterweights in his weight class he simply refused. He could have fought Cotto before or after he picked apart Mosley. He could have fought Margarito anytime before he fought Mosley. But no Floyd "retired on top" which is BS because Margarito & Cotto were prime then and were the #1 & #2 welterweights in the world at the time.

He got lucky and Magarito may have cheated when he trashed Cotto so he was allowed to kill 2 birds with one stones but that still hurts his legacy since he won't even fight Pac. He rather bet on basketball games.

My man, Cotto in no way has no argument to that. How? Floyd has always been ranked higher, he's been near the top of the P4P list since 21, he's undefeated, he's made a way bigger impact outside of boxing, Cotto has been destroyed twice, no one thinks Cotto is near the fighter that Floyd is, Floyd went to 5 divisions, he's fought more bigger guys then Cotto and everything else.

With that being said, that is no diss to Cotto. Just because you arent on a Floyd or Pac level doesnt mean that you suck. He's had a great career that nearly anyone would be proud to have

**DLT** · 03-30-2011, 11:08 AM

Originally posted by jpunieves

real responses are only for real accounts...get a life, alt...

read you posts 10x before you go to sleep and ponder why posters like you do not get respect.

lol............

**Doctor_Tenma** · 03-30-2011, 11:09 AM

Originally posted by jpunieves

real responses are only for real accounts...get a life, alt...

read you posts 10x before you go to sleep and ponder why posters like you do not get respect.

He's been here since 04 dumb ass, doesn't post as much as he used to though. Looking at this thread already, alot of emotional bitches...

**DLT** · 03-30-2011, 11:09 AM

Originally posted by johncods

Yet you just claimed that all of pac's opponents had no chance and pac's cherry picking. Then what's so rare about beating opponents you should be beating?

if you read my opening post I said that he's fought some good guys. I honeslty have no problem with Pac's recent opponents like other people do. Also, your comment makes no sense because the point is that Pac jumped up so high in ability in Floyd's eyes that guys he wouldve lost to years ago now have no chance at beating him

Why Didnt Pac Ever Test For Other Fights?