boxing weight classes problem

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THe TRiNiTY
    Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 10079
    • 405
    • 103
    • 17,986

    #11
    Originally posted by boxingking500

    1. why is there not alot of spreading of weights between boxing classes as opposed to mma classes??
    There really isn't a reason. They simply have less weight classes and boxing has more. They did it with boxing due to the international scene. A lot of boxers come from incredibly poor countries. Because of that, you are going to get smaller fighters.

    Also, sanctioning organizations wanted to make more money. More champions, more sanctioning fees.

    MMA's weight classes came after the fact. They set the limits they wanted to set and that they thought would best protect the fighters.

    2. do you think we should combine some boxing weight classes, and which ones should we combine, if you think so??
    Sadly, I don't think we should. I know that people would like to go back to the original 8 or to slim it down a bit. However, I think, historically, it could end up taking away from certain boxers. If you combined 108 and 112, for example, the best fighters historically (depending on who you ask) would now be thrown up in the air.

    However, if the sport was given a clean up and a database that would actually look at the best fighters from "now defunct" division, I'd be all for it. Then, these fighters could be signaled out as the best and could get their proper respect. I just know that isn't going to happen.

    Comment

    • cleaner147
      Retired
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 4940
      • 308
      • 484
      • 11,344

      #12
      more divisions = more belts = more fees = more $$$.

      Comment

      • Rocky Rode
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 1396
        • 47
        • 40
        • 7,962

        #13
        I'd really like to see weight classes cut down to only 10. Something similar to this would be good, IMO.
        105
        115
        125
        135
        145
        156
        168
        180
        195
        195+

        Comment

        • Spray_resistant
          Vacant interim regular(C)
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 29599
          • 2,970
          • 1,565
          • 53,384

          #14
          Originally posted by Rocky Rode
          I'd really like to see weight classes cut down to only 10. Something similar to this would be good, IMO.
          105
          115
          125
          135
          145
          156
          168
          180
          195
          195+
          That is not too bad at all.

          Comment

          • SCtrojansbaby
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 5960
            • 136
            • 72
            • 12,653

            #15
            Get rid of everything below bantam and get rid of super bantam, everything else is fine.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP