Who do you think is the better undefeated boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr or Joe Calzaghe?

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

show me an undefeated fighter & ill show you somebody who hasnt really fought anybody.


UNDEFEATED RECORDS = SU****IOUSNESS.

[Weebler I]

show me an undefeated fighter & ill show you somebody who hasnt really fought anybody.


Undefeated records = su****iousness.

fREE O.J.!!!!!

[puga]

46 and 0>>>>>>>42 and 0

beating bhop and roy>>>>>>>>>beating shane and corrales

[typeone]

not a good showing from the brits. i cant stand the mayweather character but he is a better boxer then anyone going or who has been going for th last decade. even then pacfarts know that. floyd might be a little b*tch but skill wise, he is the truth.

It depends on totally what style you like..We all no Mayweather is goona be one of the greats but up to the point of the Mosley fight I never liked his style..Running around..I must admit the finishing punch on Hatton was out of this world..

Secondly everyone has an opinion weather there right or not, is another thing...Its only the little *****es on the site who aint Adult enough except that people dont always agree...

Getting all aggressive about it as well Mmmmm..

There is something more that SOME British boxing Fans like to see..Like myself Its coming forward.And not getting hit, I mean in your face, Adjusting to other boxers styles on a turn of a coin and still be in there face lol..Some well maybe the majority from the U.S are liking dumping on Joe.. but what he did in the ring was class...Or U.S Version slappy..

If it makes some of you feel better...

Joe Calzaghe is total waste of space and Mayeather is god..

[AndrewDobson]

well calzaghe. mayweather is living off of his fights from many years ago

he hasnt done sh# in recent years .... calzaghe has been fighting consistently

[GoogleMe]

using ***** logic, cokezaghe is better because cokezaghe has never lost a fight professional or amatuer, whereas wifebeater has lost amatuer fights

You noobie, he has lost as an amateur

[daggum]

You noobie, he has lost as an amateur

he was robbed. he threw more punches than his amateur opponent therefore he should have won.

[-KPB-]

Lol at people saying Calzaghe becuase he took more risks...are you forgetting that he decided against fighting Pavlik and took the easier fight in Roy Jones......now whatever you think of Pavlik...at the time that was the fight people wanted to see...but instead he chose to fight Roy.....

They both should have taken more risks.......

[luke1979]

Lol at people saying Calzaghe becuase he took more risks...are you forgetting that he decided against fighting Pavlik and took the easier fight in Roy Jones......now whatever you think of Pavlik...at the time that was the fight people wanted to see...but instead he chose to fight Roy.....

They both should have taken more risks.......

Actually pavlik refused an offer to fight Calzaghe after the Lacy fight.

[Die Antwoord]

You noobie, he has lost as an amateur

Of course he lost as an amateur, he started boxing am when he was like 13 or so, but he didnt lose as one as an adult, I believe his last loss was at 17, not that it matters, amateur boxing doesnt mean anything.