Morales - Raheem - I honestly thought it was close.

[BLOODSHED]

i know sturm. raheem beat morales like he stole something.

[Guest]

Dude, you saw that **** on a tape delay being in England. Maxboxing only had Morales-Raheem close. They brainwashed you!

I don't even go to MaxBoxing... I got the copy from my Lounge.

No brainwashing, always a man of my own mind. Just because Erik had more put on him than usual does NOT make it a "one-sided beat down" as many would have it...

[Guest]

it wasn't competitve. Raheem :PWNED his azz.

I had 11-1 rounds fo Raheem.

Manny, see my custom title, left.

[Knicksman20]

Morales was SOUNDLY beaten like Mosely vs. Wright I. Look at his face throughout the fight & that should tell you something. MAB had the same look when Pac delivered a vicious beatdown to him & EM didn't get beat as bad MAB did. Manny Stewart said before the fight started that EM better be on his game or else he was gonna have a tough night & looked what happened. Morales was dominated that night plain and simple.

[Bozo_no no]

No brainwashing, always a man of my own mind. Just because Erik had more put on him than usual does NOT make it a "one-sided beat down" as many would have it...

Too many of you seem to be arguing that Morales didn't get beat up or beat down.

Regardless, the SCORING of that fight was NOT competitive.

If you gave Morales more than 4 rounds, you have absolutly no credibility.

NO WAY did Morales win more than four rounds in that fight. Even saying he won 4 rounds is generous.

He didn't get beat up, Raheem didn't lay a thrasing on him, but he CLEARLY and EASILLY outpointed Morales.

Period.

[Guest]

Morales was SOUNDLY beaten like Mosely vs. Wright I. Look at his face throughout the fight & that should tell you something. MAB had the same look when Pac delivered a vicious beatdown to him & EM didn't get beat as bad MAB did. Manny Stewart said before the fight started that EM better be on his game or else he was gonna have a tough night & looked what happened. Morales was dominated that night plain and simple.

Wait... let me get my head round your logic.... Morales looked like someone who'd taken a beating... but he didn't take a beat... but he still looked like someone who had... ergo he must have done?

HUH????

[Guest]

Too many of you seem to be arguing that Morales didn't get beat up or beat down.

Regardless, the SCORING of that fight was NOT competitive.

If you gave Morales more than 4 rounds, you have absolutly no credibility.

NO WAY did Morales win more than four rounds in that fight. Even saying he won 4 rounds is generous.

He didn't get beat up, Raheem didn't lay a thrasing on him, but he CLEARLY and EASILLY outpointed Morales.

Period.

Is the level of debate going to reach a higher level than this. Just saying "this is how I see it, and if you don't agree you have no credibility" does NOT a debate make.

I had it scored 7-5 in terms of rounds.

[Zab Super Judah]

I had it close also but it was also clear that raheem won if that makes sense

[AintGottaClue]

I had it close also but it was also clear that raheem won if that makes sense

nice avatar

[TyrantT316]

I would have given Morales 3 rounds AT THE MOST