As for US boxing media, you have a good point with the nostalgia issue.
The prime offender here is Bert Sugar, smug nostalgia merchant supreme.
Nostalgia can be good for selling a sport if it is used to enhance the present, as it is in baseball, but Sugar and his imitators take it way too far and use boxing's past to bash the present with, constantly.
They have told the general sports fan that boxing is no good anymore, esp. heavyweight boxing, and Americans, who often don't question media narratives, have tuned boxing out.
Sugar and his ilk have carefully crafted a narrative about Ali and black boxers in general since the 1960s, the period that made the biggest impression on them as young ********. To him Ali is a god, a superman.
The Klitschkos threaten that narrative and mythology that Sugar has spent his career creating. So he denigrates and bashes them whenever he can.
The younger generation of US boxing scribes like Dan Rafael don't have the same investment in the past that Sugar does, and are thus more open to liking the Klitschkos.
The prime offender here is Bert Sugar, smug nostalgia merchant supreme.
Nostalgia can be good for selling a sport if it is used to enhance the present, as it is in baseball, but Sugar and his imitators take it way too far and use boxing's past to bash the present with, constantly.
They have told the general sports fan that boxing is no good anymore, esp. heavyweight boxing, and Americans, who often don't question media narratives, have tuned boxing out.
Sugar and his ilk have carefully crafted a narrative about Ali and black boxers in general since the 1960s, the period that made the biggest impression on them as young ********. To him Ali is a god, a superman.
The Klitschkos threaten that narrative and mythology that Sugar has spent his career creating. So he denigrates and bashes them whenever he can.
The younger generation of US boxing scribes like Dan Rafael don't have the same investment in the past that Sugar does, and are thus more open to liking the Klitschkos.
Comment