Is David Haye a top 3 H/W right now

[Earl-Hickey]

I am picking wlad to stop haye, but I do think Haye is the legit number 3 in the division right now, even though he fought audley last.

what do you think

[Bring It On]

Yes, he is.

[Darkstar]

Yeah, I think he is top 3. Definitely no worse than top 5.

[Earl-Hickey]

I agree, not happy with his actions, but i think he's the best of the rest

[Faerun]

Of course he is. Adamak, Chambers, Chagaev (lol) or Povetkin are not on his level.

[Earl-Hickey]

Of course he is. Adamak, Chambers, Chagaev (lol) or Povetkin are not on his level.

I agree, a lot of people say chambers or povetkin would beat him but i dont see it.

Chambers is a very light puncher, and Haye would match his speed and knock him out

Povetkins style means taking 2,3 or 4 to give one, i think he too would be busted up and stopped, in fact i see that fight as Pacquiao-Hatton-Esque

Adamek suffers from simply not being a heavyweight, go and look at his fights with paul briggs, he gets hit way too much and would not take hayes power, which is more devestating than areollas slower, clubbing shots

chagaev isnt worth discussing right now

i see haye as a level above, and the brothers a level above again

[Pirao]

He's #3 only because he hasn't faced a Klitschko yet. When Wlad makes him look like a bum and KOs him he'll be dropped like Chambers and Chagaev (the #3s before Haye) were. Adamek will probably be #3 then.

[Earl-Hickey]

He's #3 only because he hasn't faced a Klitschko yet. When Wlad makes him look like a bum and KOs him he'll be dropped like Chambers and Chagaev (the #3s before Haye) were. Adamek will probably be #3 then.

sorry but that wasn't the question, i agree with the statement but thats not the point of the thread

you are devaluing wlads win before it has happened with this type of statement you realise

[Pennywise X]

Yes hes #3 only because theres noone else k bros are 1 n 2...every1 else is C level fighters.

[Pirao]

sorry but that wasn't the question, i agree with the statement but thats not the point of the thread

you are devaluing wlads win before it has happened with this type of statement you realise

Sorry but as far as I'm concerned you are who your resume says you are.

I'm not devaluing anything, I've said repeteadly that Haye will not be a better win for Wlad than Peter or Chagaev for example. Haye is just another titlist.