How much of the Klitschko brothers success is due to their size?

[Smokin'J]

They use the style what fits their size which is keeping the man at distance and breaking him bit by bit and clinching when they get on the inside,
reason therefor is they cannot go toe-to-toe with them as it takes longer and more accuracy to punch.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

The Klitschko's are two of the most skilled modern day Heavyweights. They're both so physically imposing. I think a lot of their opponents have lost the fight before they step in the ring. Wladmir's fist is almost as big as Haye's head lol. How much do you think their size aids them in their fights?

All hating aside, they are very good fighters, but their size does play a huge roll in their dominance. They use it to their advantage, which they should. That said, not any fighter their size is as good as them.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

They use the style what fits their size which is keeping the man at distance and breaking him bit by bit and clinching when they get on the inside,
reason therefor is they cannot go toe-to-toe with them as it takes longer and more accuracy to punch.

Agreed, and because of their size, they'd gas out fast fighting too high paced of a fight.

[Steelhammer2011]

The Klitschkos are so dominant because they have excellent boxing skills, amazing athleticism, very high boxing IQs, great punching power, etc.

If size is all that matters, then the top heavyweights would be Marcellus Brown, Julius Long, Jameel McCline, Nicolay Valuev, Michael Grant, Tyson Fury, Ray Austin, Evgeny Orlov, Alexander Dimitrenko, Tye Fields, etc. All of them are bigger than the Klitschkos.

Arreola KO'd McCline.
Vitali dominated every round and KO'd Arreola.

Chambers dominated Dimitrenko.
Wlad dominated every round and brutally KO'd Chambers.

Chagaev clearly beat Prime Valuev in impressive fashion.
Wlad dominated every round and KO'd Chagaev.

and there are many more examples.....

[Smokin'J]

All hating aside, they are very good fighters, but their size does play a huge roll in their dominance. They use it to their advantage, which they should. That said, not any fighter their size is as good as them.

This is what I meant, but it got out in a weird manner.
This is most appropiate and fits the Klitschkos

You could not expect Muhammad Ali to be a bodypunching toe-to-toe going killer either.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

The Klitschkos are so dominant because they have excellent boxing skills, amazing athleticism, very high boxing IQs, great punching power, etc.

If size was all that mattered, then the top heavyweights would be Marcellus Brown, Julius Long, Jameel McCline, Nicolay Valuev, Michael Grant, Ray Austin, Tyson Fury, Evgeny Orlov, Alexander Dimitrenko, Tye Fields, etc. All of them are bigger than the Klitschkos.

Arreola KO'd McCline.
Vitali dominated every round and KO'd Arreola.

Chambers completely dominated Alexander Dimitrenko.
Wlad completely dominated every round and brutally KO'd Chambers.

Chagaev clearly beat prime Valuev in impressive fashion.
Wlad dominated ever round and KO'd Chgaev.

and there are many more examples.....

Their size does matter though. Just admit it you ****** ass white boy. lol :wt:

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

This is what I meant, but it got out in a weird manner.
This is most appropiate and fits the Klitschkos

You could not expect Muhammad Ali to be a bodypunching toe-to-toe going killer either.

Thats true.

[Pullcounter]

most of the K-sisters succes is due to their size

[Larry the boss]

Their size does matter though. Just admit it you ****** ass white boy. lol :wt:

lmfao................

[Smokin'J]

lmfao................

****** ass black boy