Should there be a 24/7 for Klitschko vs Haye?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flo_Raiden
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 826
    • 72
    • 7
    • 32,503

    #1

    Should there be a 24/7 for Klitschko vs Haye?

    Or at least some kind of buildup for this fight? I'd love to see a 24/7 around those two. Would be interesting IMO.
  • Boxing Scene
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 7105
    • 915
    • 1,705
    • 29,819

    #2
    Originally posted by Flo_Raiden
    Or at least some kind of buildup for this fight? I'd love to see a 24/7 around those two. Would be interesting IMO.
    24/7 is for PPV only and this fight isn't PPV, or at least it better not be PPV.

    Comment

    • Gojira
      Pumping Iron
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 5369
      • 276
      • 325
      • 14,605

      #3
      Originally posted by Boxing Scene
      24/7 is for PPV only and this fight isn't PPV, or at least it better not be PPV.
      Yeah i wouldn't want to have to pay to see my hero get knocked out either.

      Comment

      • Boxing Scene
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2007
        • 7105
        • 915
        • 1,705
        • 29,819

        #4
        Originally posted by Napalm Death
        Yeah i wouldn't want to have to pay to see my hero get knocked out either.
        Who is your hero?

        Comment

        • Come∂ian
          Comedian Taught Her
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 4047
          • 445
          • 28
          • 16,995

          #5
          Originally posted by Boxing Scene
          24/7 is for PPV only and this fight isn't PPV, or at least it better not be PPV.
          The second most anticipated fight over past few years better not be PPV? If Marquez v Diaz II or Roy Jones v Hopkins II can be PPV's **** why cant this fight.

          I would love to see a 24/7 without Pac or Floyd.

          Comment

          • Boxing Scene
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 7105
            • 915
            • 1,705
            • 29,819

            #6
            Originally posted by Come∂ian
            The second most anticipated fight over past few years better not be PPV? If Marquez v Diaz II or Roy Jones v Hopkins II can be PPV's **** why cant this fight.

            I would love to see a 24/7 without Pac or Floyd.
            Wait you want to pay extra for this fight? I think you're arguing for it to be HBO PPV.

            Last legitimate heavyweight fight on HBO that was PPV was Tyson Lewis, correct?

            HBO doesn't do heavyweight PPV fights anymore. This wouldn't sell enough to be PPV on HBO.

            Comment

            • mushahadeen
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 7964
              • 384
              • 321
              • 8,800

              #7
              god please no.

              Comment

              • appollo33
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • May 2010
                • 137
                • 7
                • 0
                • 6,195

                #8
                Originally posted by Boxing Scene
                Wait you want to pay extra for this fight? I think you're arguing for it to be HBO PPV.

                Last legitimate heavyweight fight on HBO that was PPV was Tyson Lewis, correct?

                HBO doesn't do heavyweight PPV fights anymore. This wouldn't sell enough to be PPV on HBO.
                The last was Vitali vs. Danny Williams in 2004 i think, but i want 24/7 for Wlad vs Haye, but without ppv)

                Comment

                • Check
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 16585
                  • 677
                  • 132
                  • 26,287

                  #9
                  24/7 would be nice but there isn't enough interest to spend the money. 24/7 is a marketing tool to add a lot more viewers. This fight no matter what you do is just for the hardcore boxing fans, 24/7 would not be a good investment. A countdown, which is much cheaper, might be worth HBO's time though.

                  Comment

                  • chav
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 4344
                    • 484
                    • 886
                    • 13,057

                    #10
                    in the UK we dont normally pay for your USA PPV's, we only usually get charged when its got a Brit fighting, I would think it would be the same for you guys that HBO would just pay a fee and stick it on normal airtime no?

                    they are talking about it being 10pm roughly uk, thats 2pm west coast, would they run a boxing PPV at that time ?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP