cuz Servents of the Shard was the ****. God I sure would love a Forgotten Realms fighting game.
Sam Peter is the second coming of Foreman
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TheGreat1i started a thread like this in Dec of last year http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4004
everyone said i was crazy. check out that thread
Foreman is what like 6'4'', and was actually in shape in his prime..Peter is 5'10'' and overweight.
Peter can't jab. Foreman can.
They both can punch.
Foreman had decent skills. Peter has none.
Foreman had a good chin. Peter's is untested.
Why are you comparing them?Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Tyson Jr.People say Sam Peter is the
new Tyson. I think he is the
George Foreman.
Foreman had way more boxing skills then Peter.
Peter likes to brawl . If he can develop a jab or something i would compare him to Frazier .Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Tyson Jr.People say Sam Peter is the
new Tyson. I think he is the
George Foreman.
Once again you absolutely amaze me with your lack of boxing knowledge.
Peter won't ever be compared to Foreman. He has a different physique to start. Foreman was a tall fighter at 6'4, Peter is what, 5'10?
Peter has no jab, nor does he try to use one. Foreman had one helluva jab that would set up straight rights.
Peter is lacking in defense. Foreman was no defensive fighter, however it was more tuned than Peter's.
As much as I hate Tyson and all your Tyson nut-huggers, Tyson was better than this bum. He has an inflated record and is going to be knocked out within 6 rounds. Wladimir is too big, too good and has too good of a jab.
Where's your next "Tyson is a God amongst men" post? They're always nice for a laugh.Last edited by druth; 09-13-2005, 10:44 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by druthOnce again you absolutely amaze me with your lack of boxing knowledge.
Peter won't ever be compared to Foreman. He has a different physique to start. Foreman was a tall fighter at 6'4, Peter is what, 5'10?
Peter has no jab, nor does he try to use one. Foreman had one helluva jab that would set up straight rights.
Peter is lacking in defense. Foreman was no defensive fighter, however it was more tuned than Peter's.
As much as I hate Tyson and all your Tyson nut-huggers, Tyson was better than this bum. He has an inflated record and is going to be knocked out within 6 rounds. Wladimir is too big, too good and has too good of a jab.
Where's your next "Tyson is a God amongst men" post? They're always nice for a laugh.
your right-Peter is not as good
as Tyson.Comment
-
Originally posted by druthOnce again you absolutely amaze me with your lack of boxing knowledge.
Peter won't ever be compared to Foreman. He has a different physique to start. Foreman was a tall fighter at 6'4, Peter is what, 5'10?
Peter has no jab, nor does he try to use one. Foreman had one helluva jab that would set up straight rights.
Peter is lacking in defense. Foreman was no defensive fighter, however it was more tuned than Peter's.
As much as I hate Tyson and all your Tyson nut-huggers, Tyson was better than this bum. He has an inflated record and is going to be knocked out within 6 rounds. Wladimir is too big, too good and has too good of a jab.
Where's your next "Tyson is a God amongst men" post? They're always nice for a laugh.Comment
-
Originally posted by InThisCornerHe's Mike Tyson JR. what do u expect?
at least i dont have sugar
shane nobody in my avatar.Comment
-
Comment
Comment