I had Deleon winning by 2 points but whatcha going to do?
Who else saw De Leon robbed??
Collapse
-
Lederman had it right. 96-94. 6 rounds to 4. Rounds 1-3 was def De Leon. 4,5,6,7 were Boner's. But then 8, 9, 10 were De Leon based on activity. Sure, Boner had the more clean effective punches BUT his activity was **** and hell, in Round 9 and 10...he wasn't even throwing much at all. How can you win a round by not really throwing much of anything at all?
Boner won't make it when he fights higher level of competition though.Comment
-
Broner clearly won. I had it the same as that one judge that scored it 99-91, based on the fact that Broner is undefeated and a meaningless prospect that will hold on to his undefeated record as long as possible until he can cash out and then become a journeyman or retire.
that is the correct criteria for scoring boxing matches.Comment
-
Wasn't a total robbery, but still a bad decision. It was a close fight that De Leon should have won. And 99-91 was disgusting. No one did enough in that fight to get a score like that.
I thought De Leon would have got the nod. 96-94.Comment
Comment