Styles make fights. Raheem would've beaten Pac and MAB too.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Manny_P
    Knicks/Yankees/Giants
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 8966
    • 542
    • 799
    • 19,102

    #11
    Originally posted by raesaad
    Stop short please Morales was not himself totally, not making any excuses it was a great win for Raheem but he could not have handled the forementioned as easily or even Morales on one of his A game fights.

    Morales fought ta same way as he did Pacman. HE FOUGHT HIS BEST FIGHT gainst Pacman.

    Raheem = Betta than Morales!

    Comment

    • mic573
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 4646
      • 98
      • 14
      • 11,280

      #12
      Originally posted by ClydeErwinBarretto
      MAB is even slower than MORALES. Maybe he would've wisen up a lot faster...but that kid is SLICK.
      Barrera appeared quicker than Morales to me in the three fights they fought. I don't think he could beat Raheem though.

      Comment

      • Manny_P
        Knicks/Yankees/Giants
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2005
        • 8966
        • 542
        • 799
        • 19,102

        #13
        Originally posted by mic573
        Barrera appeared quicker than Morales to me in the three fights they fought. I don't think he could beat Raheem though.
        Pacman has ta superior handspeed ova Barrera and Morales. I think Pac has ta best chance, IF BEST WEIGHT vs BEST WEIGHT. That bein said, it aint happenin and it's jest a fantasy match-up.

        Comment

        • prtynacan
          Up and Comer
          • May 2004
          • 71
          • 6
          • 0
          • 6,116

          #14
          I think MAB has the best chance also, especially seeing how he handled Hamed. MAB's got better D than Morales and he's committed to the body attack, both of which you need against a quick guy like Raheem. Only problem with MAB is that he's undersized.

          Pac Man would need to just keep attacking him - and for once put his hands up. Right now he fights like Rocky Balboa. He'd get carved up as is.

          Comment

          • Tha Greatest
            boxingscene legend
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2004
            • 15748
            • 616
            • 963
            • 24,468

            #15
            Manny P,

            I like how you respect every fighter and give them all the credit that they deserve.

            Comment

            • RAESAAD
              THE MUTHA****IN TRUTH
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 24331
              • 2,370
              • 1,730
              • 40,454

              #16
              Originally posted by Manny_P
              Morales fought ta same way as he did Pacman. HE FOUGHT HIS BEST FIGHT gainst Pacman.

              Raheem = Betta than Morales!
              Well that equals better than Pac too then and I disagree Morales did not fight nearly his best fight that assumption is ludacris.

              Comment

              • InThisCorner
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 1351
                • 54
                • 49
                • 1,521

                #17
                yeah I agree with #14 poster...MAB maybe could beat Raheem, he beat Hamed pretty easily, but i still don't think he would beat Raheem. Raheem is just to quick, and too fast. He jabs much more then hamed i think it would cause some problems.

                Damn im jumping on the Raheem bandwagon...I didn't realize he was THIS good.

                Comment

                • jack_the_rippuh
                  I to your mom..
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 31699
                  • 1,148
                  • 627
                  • 65,521

                  #18
                  Pacquiao's only chance is to connect with a monster left to KO him.
                  Pacquiao wouldn't win a round against Raheem if he doesn't hurt him badly or knock him down.

                  You know that as well as I do, Manny P.

                  Comment

                  • Manny_P
                    Knicks/Yankees/Giants
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2005
                    • 8966
                    • 542
                    • 799
                    • 19,102

                    #19
                    Originally posted by raesaad
                    Well that equals better than Pac too then and I disagree Morales did not fight nearly his best fight that assumption is ludacris.
                    Man, ratha than sayin Morales ******, why don't you jest say Raheem was ****in spectacular.

                    Hate = No good. And it's obvious, showin how you bring Pac in a discussion that doesn't involve him at all. LOL!

                    Comment

                    • InThisCorner
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 1351
                      • 54
                      • 49
                      • 1,521

                      #20
                      Just face it, Morales is to slow for the division boys.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP