Stop short please Morales was not himself totally, not making any excuses it was a great win for Raheem but he could not have handled the forementioned as easily or even Morales on one of his A game fights.
Morales fought ta same way as he did Pacman. HE FOUGHT HIS BEST FIGHT gainst Pacman.
Barrera appeared quicker than Morales to me in the three fights they fought. I don't think he could beat Raheem though.
Pacman has ta superior handspeed ova Barrera and Morales. I think Pac has ta best chance, IF BEST WEIGHT vs BEST WEIGHT. That bein said, it aint happenin and it's jest a fantasy match-up.
I think MAB has the best chance also, especially seeing how he handled Hamed. MAB's got better D than Morales and he's committed to the body attack, both of which you need against a quick guy like Raheem. Only problem with MAB is that he's undersized.
Pac Man would need to just keep attacking him - and for once put his hands up. Right now he fights like Rocky Balboa. He'd get carved up as is.
yeah I agree with #14 poster...MAB maybe could beat Raheem, he beat Hamed pretty easily, but i still don't think he would beat Raheem. Raheem is just to quick, and too fast. He jabs much more then hamed i think it would cause some problems.
Damn im jumping on the Raheem bandwagon...I didn't realize he was THIS good.
Pacquiao's only chance is to connect with a monster left to KO him.
Pacquiao wouldn't win a round against Raheem if he doesn't hurt him badly or knock him down.
Comment