Did anyone else think Sanchez beat DeMarco?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spray_resistant
    Vacant interim regular(C)
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 29362
    • 2,836
    • 1,505
    • 53,384

    #1

    Did anyone else think Sanchez beat DeMarco?

    I just didn't see Demarco doing much and getting out worked during most of the rounds from 6 on. Not the worst decision and certainly not a robbery but I thought Sanchez came back from the 5th on and won it.
  • Cuauhtémoc1520
    Head Mexican in Charge
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 20824
    • 1,666
    • 569
    • 35,996

    #2
    Come on man, Sanchez didn't do anything but push Demarco all night. He couldn't have made a baby cry with those shots.

    Demarco won easily, Sanchez did nothing but lay on him all night.

    Comment

    • BigStereotype
      #1 Knicks Fan
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 6177
      • 325
      • 792
      • 14,139

      #3
      lol no. Nobody won that fight haha but Sanchez definitely lost it.

      Comment

      • Spray_resistant
        Vacant interim regular(C)
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 29362
        • 2,836
        • 1,505
        • 53,384

        #4
        Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502
        Come on man, Sanchez didn't do anything but push Demarco all night. He couldn't have made a baby cry with those shots.

        Demarco won easily, Sanchez did nothing but lay on him all night.
        Even if he doesn't have power and wasn't hurting him he was landing and had DeMarco totally defensive and ineffective for most of the fight......like a said not a robbery but very unimpressive by DeMarco.

        Comment

        • Kevin Malone
          @********Lampley
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 4936
          • 243
          • 260
          • 11,457

          #5
          Not to question your judgement but 1. Were you drinking anything? 2. Stream or TV?

          I thought the commentary was excellent in describing why DeMarco was winning. DeMarco was landing the better shots clearly. I had it 117-111 DeMarco. Didn't think it was that close. Sanchez fought how he had to make it somewhat competitive but his handspeed was very poor.

          Comment

          • ИATAS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 36648
            • 2,509
            • 1,953
            • 50,835

            #6
            that fight was way to gay for me to care

            Comment

            • Spray_resistant
              Vacant interim regular(C)
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 29362
              • 2,836
              • 1,505
              • 53,384

              #7
              Originally posted by Kevin Malone
              Not to question your judgement but 1. Were you drinking anything? 2. Stream or TV?

              I thought the commentary was excellent in describing why DeMarco was winning. DeMarco was landing the better shots clearly. I had it 117-111 DeMarco. Didn't think it was that close. Sanchez fought how he had to make it somewhat competitive but his handspeed was very poor.
              Yes I am drunk but IDK, hard for me to give him 9n rounds like you are saying.

              Comment

              • Kevin Malone
                @********Lampley
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 4936
                • 243
                • 260
                • 11,457

                #8
                Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                Yes I am drunk but IDK, hard for me to give him 9n rounds like you are saying.
                The drunk people thought Alexander beat Kotelnik too. It seems people who drink give way too much credit to guys who are coming forward and throwing and don't have as good of perception of the quality of punches.

                Comment

                • Cuauhtémoc1520
                  Head Mexican in Charge
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 20824
                  • 1,666
                  • 569
                  • 35,996

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                  Even if he doesn't have power and wasn't hurting him he was landing and had DeMarco totally defensive and ineffective for most of the fight......like a said not a robbery but very unimpressive by DeMarco.
                  No man, he wasn't landing **** and when he did they were slapping shots with ZERO effect. I give the kid credit, he has a lot of heart but he wasn't doing anything to win the fight.

                  I agree with the other poster the announcers were calling it perfectly, it's called QUALITY OF SHOTS that matter as well and Sanchez wasn't landing ANYTHING of quality.

                  Comment

                  • Spray_resistant
                    Vacant interim regular(C)
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 29362
                    • 2,836
                    • 1,505
                    • 53,384

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Kevin Malone
                    The drunk people thought Alexander beat Kotelnik too. It seems people who drink give way too much credit to guys who are coming forward and throwing and don't have as good of perception of the quality of punches.

                    I am not the most unreasonable drunk and will watch this again sober if everyone thinks a 7-5 Sanchez is totally out of line and not possible......I am not so wasted though to know that DeMarco didn't look good and certainly not ready for world class comp in any case.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP