Who wins & how?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prime Naseem Hamed vs Pacquiao @ FW
Collapse
-
Prime Naseem Hamed vs Pacquiao @ FW
103Hamed Via KO/TKO33.01%34Hamed Via Decision0.00%0Pacquiao Via KO/TKO63.11%65Pacquiao Via Decision3.88%4Tags: None
-
I heart the Prince. But come on it should be evident by now his competition was not exactly up to par. And when he did step up we saw what happened. Let's leave it at that. Great career, great legacy, HOFer.
-
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
Pacquiao was a wreckless one dimensional fighter at featherweight. Naz would knock him spark out.
Hamed was good at knocking out bums but this is what happens when he comes up against a real fighter:
And Pac is a real fighter- Blood in, Blood out. Pac's chin was as good then as it is now. Hamed relied on his power to intimidate his opponents, but Pac would walk right through it and make hamed eat straight left bombs all night.Last edited by DARKSEID; 02-17-2011, 10:13 PM.
Comment
-
We are talking at 126 lbs here guys.
Barrera was spot on prime when he beat Nas and he was a couple of years past prime when Pac beat him. Same Pac couldn'rt beat JMM or Morales when he moved up.
Pac's best fighting weight is 140-147. Even fighting Marg he was still 150. Thats the grounds I use to give the KO to Naz.
Also Naz is the harder puncher.
And Kevin Kelley and Wayne McCulloch weren't bums. No more than JMM and Cotto.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rbgnwo View PostAnd what was naz lol?
Hamed was good at knocking out bums but this is what happens when he comes up against a real fighter:
And Pac is a real fighter- Blood in, Blood out. Pac's chin was as good then as it is now. Hamed relied on his power to intimidate his opponents, but Pac would walk right through it and make hamed eat straight left bombs all night.
Barrera fought a tactical fight. Pacquiao didnt have the seasoning at FW to pull off what Barrera did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostLOL@ walking through Naz's punches. Impossible.
Barrera fought a tactical fight. Pacquiao didnt have the seasoning at FW to pull off what Barrera did.
Pac vs Hamed would be a brawl because pac always comes back when you hit him, and I don't pick anyone against pac in a brawl.Last edited by DARKSEID; 02-17-2011, 10:20 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rbgnwo View Postalso don't forget that Pac's reclessness was what made him so dangerous at those weights.
Pac vs Hamed would be a brawl because pac always comes back when you hit him, and I don't pick anyone against pac in a brawl.
And that was Naz on both counts
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostIn a brawl, I pick the guy with the harder punch and the better chin.
And that was Naz on both counts
He fought like he was possessed by demons- like he was a blood hungry madman, and I don't see hamed slowing him down for a second.
Comment
Comment