Khan V Bradley "done in principle" July 23rd

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mayweather41-0
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2010
    • 3838
    • 133
    • 11
    • 10,863

    #11
    Originally posted by bojangles1987
    Personally I think it will look similar to Bradley-Alexander, except Khan is MUCH better at the type of fight Alexander tried to fight than Alexander is. I expect a pretty close fight, but I think Bradley finds a way to win it.
    I also think Bradley finds a way to win it is not in his DNA to lose the way that man trains is scary. I do not know though I think it is going to be whoever is hungrier that night and wants the W.

    Comment

    • sunny31
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 5774
      • 449
      • 35
      • 128,703

      #12
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      The countdown is on. Bradley's sugar coated reign comes to an end. Tick tock.
      Sugar coated reign? I hope that was sarcastic

      This will be a very good fight, I think khan will start fast and be ahead after 6 rounds, but then will slow down in the middle rounds and get his second wind after round 9 to win a tight ud. There will be some great exchanges in this fight and I expect khan to get wobbled once or twice. Ultimately Bradley won't be able to match khan's workrate, khan's length and jab will allow him to get off first and more often.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #13
        Originally posted by sunny31
        Sugar coated reign? I hope that was sarcastic
        Not at all.

        Comment

        • sunny31
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 5774
          • 449
          • 35
          • 128,703

          #14
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          Not at all.
          Pha ha ha...who should he have fought that he hasn't?

          His resume is very good. It is the best at 140.

          Holt, witter, alexander, are very good wins. Peterson and Campbell are also solid wins. He would probably have maidana on that record as well through no fault of his own. You are a tit

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #15
            Originally posted by sunny31
            Pha ha ha...who should he have fought that he hasn't?

            His resume is very good. It is the best at 140.

            Holt, witter, alexander, are very good wins. Peterson and Campbell are also solid wins. He would probably have maidana on that record as well through no fault of his own. You are a tit
            I didnt say his resume wasnt good you tit.

            His performances on the other hand...

            Comment

            • sunny31
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 5774
              • 449
              • 35
              • 128,703

              #16
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              I didnt say his resume wasnt good you tit.

              His performances on the other hand...
              Yeah well when your put in 50/50 fights, especially against fighters like witter and alexander it isn't always going to create the best spectacle, he always brings it. And how does that in any way relate to his reign being sugar coated?

              Comment

              • madsweeney
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 4552
                • 508
                • 298
                • 14,237

                #17
                I'd normally give Amir the nod on this one but something tells me he's riding a high right now and won't be mentally there enough to get the win. Ditching Ariza may be his downfall if this new guy lets Amir be lazy.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #18
                  Originally posted by sunny31
                  Yeah well when your put in 50/50 fights, especially against fighters like witter and alexander it isn't always going to create the best spectacle, he always brings it. And how does that in any way relate to his reign being sugar coated?
                  The only reason they were 50/50 fights was because Bradley was just as average as his opponents.

                  His reign is sugar coated because people get blinded by these names on his resume, which are admittedly good names, but they arent exactly killers. And they automatically rate him highly on the p4p lists even though his performances have been on the whole...well....*****.

                  Comment

                  • sunny31
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 5774
                    • 449
                    • 35
                    • 128,703

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    The only reason they were 50/50 fights was because Bradley was just as average as his opponents.

                    His reign is sugar coated because people get blinded by these names on his resume, which are admittedly good names, but they arent exactly killers. And they automatically rate him highly on the p4p lists even though his performances have been on the whole...well....*****.
                    No they were 50/50 fights because the general public was more or less split down the middle on who they thought was gonna win. He is a p4p entrant not high on the list. He is a p4p entrant because he has built such a solid resume and is still undefeated, and whether he is on the list or not depends on a whole host of factors including who is around at the time and who is doing well. Right as of this moment I would say he has earned the right to be called one of the best 10 fighters in the world.

                    You have completely contradicted yourself also, by saying his opponents are just as average as him, but then stating they are good names...wtf? He can only face world class guys because none of the elite guys will fight him. The only way he can step up from the level he is fighting at is by facing pacquiao, or mayweather. I don't think khan is a level above what he has been facing, khan is at the same level, and they now must find out who is the best. By disregarding Bradley's resume you are insulting the whole division, which most boxing fans and experts regard as the best in boxing.

                    Comment

                    • Pullcounter
                      no guts no glory
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 42582
                      • 549
                      • 191
                      • 49,739

                      #20
                      Originally posted by acdc
                      The fighters must still review the terms before signing off on any agreement.
                      this "article" is a waste of space.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP