I think everyone can agree Shane fought the better competition than PBF

[HAVISJ]

i see your point.........too bad floyd grew a vagina instead.......shame shame....................

guess you didn't know floyd tried to fight a young shane and oscar. Shane priced himself out asking for 10mill. Floyd wouldn't beaten shane regardless of when they fought

[ShoopDaWhoop]

guess you didn't know floyd tried to fight a young shane and oscar. Shane priced himself out asking for 10mill. Floyd wouldn't beaten shane regardless of when they fought

Shoop Da Whoop thinks you bring nothing but lies. Shoop Da Whoop believes Shane wouldve beatin Floydie last year if he wasnt so inactive. Floyd's defense is greatly overrated. Shoop Da Whoop thinks Shane wouldve easily gotten passed it.

[al-Xander]

he fought almost all the challenges presented..............when all is said is done ............ fans will appreciate shane more than floyd.......that is indisputable...................

LOL. I've never really thought about it that way. And yes, SM has fought everyone and still fighting. This time he's fighting the best of them all and just shows he has balls to do it. Oh yes, people say he's fighting for a big pay day. LOL. What good is money if you're a disabled person?

[Chopper417]

Even as a Floyd fan I have to appreciate Shayne's resume and willingness to fight anyone under any circumstances. He's a miserable businessman, hence why he never became a PPV star, but he literally has fought all comers.

Some people just wake up everyday hating Floyd, but he is all they think about. I think it's hilarious that the man is literally irrelevant to the sport right now but all of his haters still talk/think about him every day

[Walt Liquor]

Losses aren't part of a resume, you don't apply for a job listing the places you failed to work at. If we go by this, Augustus has a better resume than most today and Laporte has one of the best ever.

of course they are, but they're weighed differently than wins.

For example, competitive loss vs prime winky>win in a title eliminator vs Henry bruseles.

Resume=wins, losses, and circumstances surrounding those wins losses/competition.

A resume is supposed to include all of your work experience. Just because we leave a job off our resume doesn't mean it didn't happen.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Shanes resume is as good as Zab Judahs.

You dont get credit for losses.

[ShoopDaWhoop]

Shanes resume is as good as Zab Judahs.

You dont get credit for losses.

Shoop Da Whoop thinks that you get more credit for steeping in the ring with opponents then running away from them.

[Walt Liquor]

Losses aren't part of a resume, you don't apply for a job listing the places you failed to work at. If we go by this, Augustus has a better resume than most today and Laporte has one of the best ever.

I knOw people who have been rehired at companies where they were fired from. It's more common than you think.

[Walt Liquor]

Shanes resume is as good as Zab Judahs.

You dont get credit for losses.

answer this burner, are losses not learning experiences if they are competitive. Are they not part of your experience as a fighter? Do losses yet having the balls to face a greater fighter than youself say something about the mentality and makeup of a fighter?

If you answered yes to any of the above questions, then losses/competition level is 100% part of your resume.

If losses means you forget everything that happened incthe ring and you are forever a complete failure after having a loss, then they do not count on a resume.

Losses count differently, some losses hurt more than others just like some wins are better than others.

[Walt Liquor]

Shanes resume is as good as Zab Judahs.

You dont get credit for losses.

What zab win or wins=Shane over prime Oscar?