Peter will probably weigh as much as klit ,around 250 . Byrd weighed 213 for the klit fight ! and there both about 6 foot . Peter is alot bigger the Byrd !
Peter is weighin in at 250...that's just sad especially for how short he is.
Wlad is going to destroy this guy after the 2nd or 3rd round. The jab, and straight right hand is going to KO this "Nigerian Newbie". He's overated, overhyped, and overweight.
Not as ****** as reading that post and thinking he was compairing those fighters.
He was clearly illustrating that statistics don't always tell the story.
Your a dumbass, still bitter from the other thread? What are you like 14 years old? Not only are you half ******ed for claiming that Lewis stunned Vitali in round 6 as bad as Vitali stunned Lewis in round 2, but you're an idiot overall.
Your telling me that He did not compare Foremans and Holyfields situation to Peters? Wasn't that the purpose of his post to show that Peter has a chance to pull of an upset based on results that happened in the past?
Allow me to evaluate for your handicapped ass as to why he shouldn't of used Foreman and Holyfield for the comparisson.
George Foreman beat Moorer because he had 60+ fights under his belt, an iron chin, stone cold power, and more expirience than a fighter can imagine.
Holyfield beat Tyson, because he showed to be an all time great, by showing tremendous heart and skill in the past against Bowe, Holmes, and Foreman.
Now Peter will beat Wlad because he has what? Awful footwork, bad handspeed, suspect stamina, because he disposed of all time greats such as Taurus Sykes, and Jeremy Williams?
I dont think you understand Foreman, Tyson, Moorer, and Holyfield are all time greats, meaning they can square off against anyone in history of boxing, and be the underdog, but at the same time have a chance to pull of an upset anytime anywhere.
Not saying that Wlad is that much superior to Peter, but he is. He has better speed, more power, more ring intelligence, much more expirience, an elite jab, a better stronger left hook and right hand. Tremendous talent, yet he's coming in as the underdog in this fight.
A better comparison would've been, remember upsets happen look at Lewis vs Mc'Call and Lewis vs Rahman. And even Mc'Call and Rahman at there high point have showed more talent than Peter to date.
Peter will probably weigh as much as klit ,around 250 . Byrd weighed 213 for the klit fight ! and there both about 6 foot . Peter is alot bigger the Byrd !
Peter is clearly bigger in size, although i though last time i checked the height measurements I thought Peter was 5'11, and Byrd was 6'2, my mistake, they're both 6'0. Thats what I meant by Byrd being bigger.
Your a dumbass, still bitter from the other thread? What are you like 14 years old? Not only are you half ******ed for claiming that Lewis stunned Vitali in round 6 as bad as Vitali stunned Lewis in round 2, but you're an idiot overall.
Your telling me that He did not compare Foremans and Holyfields situation to Peters? Wasn't that the purpose of his post to show that Peter has a chance to pull of an upset based on results that happened in the past?
Allow me to evaluate for your handicapped ass as to why he shouldn't of used Foreman and Holyfield for the comparisson.
George Foreman beat Moorer because he had 60+ fights under his belt, an iron chin, stone cold power, and more expirience than a fighter can imagine.
Holyfield beat Tyson, because he showed to be an all time great, by showing tremendous heart and skill in the past against Bowe, Holmes, and Foreman.
Now Peter will beat Wlad because he has what? Awful footwork, bad handspeed, suspect stamina, because he disposed of all time greats such as Taurus Sykes, and Jeremy Williams?
I dont think you understand Foreman, Tyson, Moorer, and Holyfield are all time greats, meaning they can square off against anyone in history of boxing, and be the underdog, but at the same time have a chance to pull of an upset anytime anywhere.
Not saying that Wlad is that much superior to Peter, but he is. He has better speed, more power, more ring intelligence, much more expirience, an elite jab, a better stronger left hook and right hand. Tremendous talent, yet he's coming in as the underdog in this fight.
A better comparison would've been, remember upsets happen look at Lewis vs Mc'Call and Lewis vs Rahman. And even Mc'Call and Rahman at there high point have showed more talent than Peter to date.
Peter is clearly bigger in size, although i though last time i checked the height measurements I thought Peter was 5'11, and Byrd was 6'2, my mistake, they're both 6'0. Thats what I meant by Byrd being bigger.
Taller is not bigger.
That's ******, just like all of your non sense in that other thread was ******, just like you jumping on someone for a simple analogy was ******.
Again, that compairison was to show stats aren't the tell all be all. It had nothing to do with compairing individual fighters, but like an idiot, you found a way to upset yourself and responded with ******ity.
Something you've shown several times over your very good at.
That's ******, just like all of your non sense in that other thread was ******, just like you jumping on someone for a simple analogy was ******.
Again, that compairison was to show stats aren't the tell all be all. It had nothing to do with compairing individual fighters, but like an idiot, you found a way to upset yourself and responded with ******ity.
Something you've shown several times over your very good at.
Byrd bigger than Peter...
Does anyone take you seriously on this board? Did you just turn 14?
Comment