Khan vs Bradley: 50/50 or does Khan deserve larger share?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wazaa.
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 13956
    • 773
    • 643
    • 15,658

    #61
    50-50 US money

    80-20 UK money in favour of Amir.

    Period.

    Comment

    • sunny31
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 5774
      • 449
      • 35
      • 128,703

      #62
      Bradley-Khan in the UK with the gate alone would probably bring in a minimum of £3-5 million to the pot, that is WITHOUT any tv money. Bradley has to realise that this fight even with a 65-35 would probably double his previous best pay day.

      Comment

      • dvb
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 1479
        • 75
        • 106
        • 7,684

        #63
        50-50.

        both bring belts,both need each other to unify and become no1 without any doubt.

        if they dont want 50 50,60 to the winner,40 to the loser.

        Comment

        • breezy53
          Contender
          • Jan 2011
          • 107
          • 9
          • 0
          • 6,176

          #64
          Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
          Bradley-Alexander drew over 6000 fans to Detroit.
          Khan-Maidana drew over 4000 fans to Vegas.
          Bradley-Alexander TV rating was 1.345M, Khan-Maidana TV rating was 1.17M.

          Those numbers tell me Bradley deserves 60/40.
          I know you're joking. The "SUPERFIGHT" sold a whimpering 339 tickets 2 weeks before the date, they had to let thousands of people in for free on the night to make it look respectable. Let me remind you, these are the two american 140lb kings no less. . . .
          And two foreigners fighting on US shores drew a TV rating 15% less than the AMERICAN 140lb Kings? And how many ppv subscriptions did the "SUPERFIGHT" sell? Oh, yeah, they didnt have enough confidence to put it on ppv. On the otherhand 100,000 brits stayed awake at 4am to pay and watch the KHan fight. Not to mention over 1000 people flying out from britain at a cost of well over $1000 each to fly 5,000 miles. Now ill ask again how many americans would be willing to pay that amount to see Bradley fight? As evident from the "SUPERFIGHT" people werent even willing to travel 5miles for FREE tickets to see him. Speak on it.

          Comment

          • SCtrojansbaby
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 5951
            • 136
            • 72
            • 12,653

            #65
            70/30 nobody pays money to watch Bradley fight

            Comment

            • THe TRiNiTY
              Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 10079
              • 405
              • 103
              • 17,986

              #66
              It depends on where the money is coming from.

              In terms of the American money, Bradley should receive the lion's share. Same can be said for the British money. However, I think 60/40 in terms of American money, 70/30 for British money.

              Bradley isn't big enough to demand any more from America and he's not big enough to expect any more in terms of European money.

              Comment

              • Pez
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2010
                • 1563
                • 41
                • 44
                • 7,937

                #67
                50-50 is fair, but I think 55-45 for Khan is the way to go.

                Comment

                • -GDS-
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1975
                  • 52
                  • 28
                  • 9,901

                  #68
                  Originally posted by lfc19titles
                  higher ratings where exactly? in the uk nobody cares or hardly knows about bradley and alexander mate

                  khan is known to casual fans and non boxing fans as well

                  he deserves nearly all of the uk
                  Bradley's fight recieved higher ratings in the organization that's going to pay for this fight (HBO). But I'm sure you'll say that doesn't matter.

                  Comment

                  • Sweet Jesus
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 11512
                    • 568
                    • 332
                    • 13,576

                    #69
                    I like how we negotiate for the fighters on BoxingScene.

                    Guilty.

                    Comment

                    • JDezi4
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 3822
                      • 95
                      • 194
                      • 10,052

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
                      I like how we negotiate for the fighters on BoxingScene.

                      Guilty.
                      The thread wasn't suppose to be about whether or not a 50-50 purse split was fair. It was suppose to be about whether or not Khan (who would ultimately be the one to have to make this decision) should just take the 50-50 just to make the fight happen, or should Khan just walk away from it...

                      Lmao, by the time I came here to check on it, there were already 68 replies, everyone was didn't get my point, Khan became a bum, while Bradley became a overhyped... nations got involved...

                      Hmm... maybe I should re-do this one?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP