Comments Thread For: Khan-Bradley Talks are Going Well So Far, Says Schaefer
Collapse
-
-
Ok, the original question was name one time that a champion, who is considered to be #1 in his division, took less than his opponent.
I know the bigger draw usually gets the bigger split but not in championship fights when the champion is clearly the best in his division. Emphasis on CHAMPION!!!!!!!!Comment
-
I know what the question was and I gave you the answer man.Ok, the original question was name one time that a champion, who is considered to be #1 in his division, took less than his opponent.
I know the bigger draw usually gets the bigger split but not in championship fights when the champion is clearly the best in his division. Emphasis on CHAMPION!!!!!!!!
Hopkins was the champion and the considered the #1 in his division man and took less money than Oscar.
Baldomir was the man who beat the man and took less money to against Floyd.
Pac got paid more than Hatton who was #1 and lineal champ at the time at 140.
Emphasis on CHAMPION it has happened plenty of times.
The bigger draw usually gets more than the champion who's #1.Comment
-
Blinded by loyalty? I dont really care who the bigger draw is or how the money is split. Im just telling you the facts - Khan is the bigger draw here and in the US.
You can sig a bet now if you want.Comment
-
Alright, I concede to Oscar. Who didn't he make more money than? That's why they called him the golden boy ( overrated in my opinion). Nobody ever thought of Baldomir as #1 anything. And Hatton/Pac was a 50/50 split.I know what the question was and I gave you the answer man.
Hopkins was the champion and the considered the #1 in his division man and took less money than Oscar.
Baldomir was the man who beat the man and took less money to against Floyd.
Pac got paid more than Hatton who was #1 and lineal champ at the time at 140.
Emphasis on CHAMPION it has happened plenty of times.
The bigger draw usually gets more than the champion who's #1.Comment
-
Comment
-
Well Baldomir was the lineal champ and he beat the man to be the man...I mean Bradley is not the lineal champ BTW.
So Bradley is not thee champion. Emphasis on CHAMPION!!!!!
And, Pac-Hatton agreed to 50/50 but then Pac said he wanted more money or he wouldn't fight. And, he got more money.Comment
-
Unless you can show me something other than this I think you're wrong on Pac/Hatton.Well Baldomir was the lineal champ and he beat the man to be the man...I mean Bradley is not the lineal champ BTW.
So Bradley is not thee champion. Emphasis on CHAMPION!!!!!
And, Pac-Hatton agreed to 50/50 but then Pac said he wanted more money or he wouldn't fight. And, he got more money.
http://www.************.com/2009/01/...t-with-hatton/Comment
-
Comment
-
Shame on Pac , I thought Floyd was the only one to cry more money or no fight !!Well Baldomir was the lineal champ and he beat the man to be the man...I mean Bradley is not the lineal champ BTW.
So Bradley is not thee champion. Emphasis on CHAMPION!!!!!
And, Pac-Hatton agreed to 50/50 but then Pac said he wanted more money or he wouldn't fight. And, he got more money.
BTW Bradley will beat Khan , Bradley is underated and Khan is overated should be a good matchup .Comment
Comment