Bradley is right, he those recent Pacquiao opponents are stiffs, so only suggest Bradley to beat either of this stiff "Cotto, Clottey or Margarito" and then he get his shot at Pacman. Is that asking too much?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bradley: Pacquiao is Being Fed Stiffs, I Can Beat Him!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MCCCXXXIII View PostActually Khans and Bradleys resumes are very comparable over the last 6 fights i have no problem with people saying that Bradley has the better resume but to say Khans resume is substandard compared to Bradleys is an over exaggeration
Khan
Marcos Rene Maidana
Paul Malignaggi
Dmitriy Salita
Andriy Kotelnik
Marco Antonio Barrera
Oisin ***an
Bradley
Devon Alexander
Luis Carlos Abregu
Lamont Peterson
Nate Campbell
Kendall Holt
Edner Cherry
Hardly worlds apart when it comes to resume over the last 6 fights and lets not forget Khan is 3 years younger but i do agree that Khan and Bradley should fight this year.
Substandard can be perceived to be an exaggerated term,but most would agree that Bradley has a better resume,especially when you look at where his competition stood in the ranks when he had fought them.When you look at 3 of Khan's recent 6 opponents current careers,it is easy to dismiss them, let alone laugh-especially when you add up WHY they were selected (especially Paulie-he can't break that "glass jaw", and we all know Barrera's current state).
Comment
-
Bradley is constantly improving, although I'm not against it, I'd rather he take care of Maidana, Khan or even Berto before he steps to Pacquiao. That's one of the main thing that separates Bradley from most guys in the sport...he's looking to get better. Right after the Alexander fight he was on some radio show (Can't remember name) and what he said was "I want to get right back in the gym, I want to work on my technique more".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Webber676 View PostBradley is right, he those recent Pacquiao opponents are stiffs, so only suggest Bradley to beat either of this stiff "Cotto, Clottey or Margarito" and then he get his shot at Pacman. Is that asking too much?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostTop Rank Promotions CEO Bob Arum believes WBO/WBC junior welterweight champion Timothy Bradley might be a good match for southpaw WBO welterweight (147 pounds)titlist Manny Pacquiao as early as the fall or the first half of 2011. Bradley (27-0, 11 knockouts) believes that he will be the perfect opponent to defeat the 32-year-old Pacquiao (52-3-2, 38 KOs).
[Click Here To Read More]
Comment
-
Originally posted by damned1974 View PostLook man,Pac could beat Bradley,but lets face it,none of Pac's recent opponents have deserved a shot at him.Bradley if anyone is at least undefeated and tops in 140.This whole "he hasn't earned a shot is b.s." Did Manny "earn" a shot at Cotto for his belt? How about Hatton or even the vacant JMW belt? You wanna tell me how Manny EARNED a shot when he hasn't fought in these weight classes before he got his title shot. The truth is,Manny got his chances and opportunities when he himself didn't work his way through the divisions,so why not give other up and comers a chance????
Your absolutely right. Manny has fought nothing but names on the downslide since coming up in weight. Floyd is by far the P4P best in boxing. It's not even close. Manny brings excitement but so did Gatti and so many others. Manny hasn't even fought for a true title since coming up. He should have fought Bradley instead of Hatton. Definitely Bradley after Hatton at least. Bradley has fought and beaten some very highly touted fighters in their primes including 2 undefeated. That's something that Manny hasn't done so the Bradley needs to earn it BS needs to stop cause Clottey and Margarito damn sure didn't earn a shot when they got it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostAt what weight, 147? If so, he'd beat all three in my opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Webber676 View PostBradley is right, he those recent Pacquiao opponents are stiffs, so only suggest Bradley to beat either of this stiff "Cotto, Clottey or Margarito" and then he get his shot at Pacman. Is that asking too much?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostAt what weight, 147? If so, he'd beat all three in my opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by damned1974 View PostLook,I am not saying Khan is crap-don't misunderstand me.The thing I was saying is that Bradley's resume is better (I pointed that out to people saying Bradley doesn't have a legit arguement to face the best).
Substandard can be perceived to be an exaggerated term,but most would agree that Bradley has a better resume,especially when you look at where his competition stood in the ranks when he had fought them.When you look at 3 of Khan's recent 6 opponents current careers,it is easy to dismiss them, let alone laugh-especially when you add up WHY they were selected (especially Paulie-he can't break that "glass jaw", and we all know Barrera's current state).
I have no doubt that Khan and Bradley will fight sometime this year as long as Bradley doesn’t price himself out by asking for 50/50 split.
Comment
Comment