Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley: Pacquiao is Being Fed Stiffs, I Can Beat Him!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Bradley is right, he those recent Pacquiao opponents are stiffs, so only suggest Bradley to beat either of this stiff "Cotto, Clottey or Margarito" and then he get his shot at Pacman. Is that asking too much?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by MCCCXXXIII View Post
      Actually Khans and Bradleys resumes are very comparable over the last 6 fights i have no problem with people saying that Bradley has the better resume but to say Khans resume is substandard compared to Bradleys is an over exaggeration

      Khan
      Marcos Rene Maidana
      Paul Malignaggi
      Dmitriy Salita
      Andriy Kotelnik
      Marco Antonio Barrera
      Oisin ***an

      Bradley
      Devon Alexander
      Luis Carlos Abregu
      Lamont Peterson
      Nate Campbell
      Kendall Holt
      Edner Cherry

      Hardly worlds apart when it comes to resume over the last 6 fights and lets not forget Khan is 3 years younger but i do agree that Khan and Bradley should fight this year.
      Look,I am not saying Khan is crap-don't misunderstand me.The thing I was saying is that Bradley's resume is better (I pointed that out to people saying Bradley doesn't have a legit arguement to face the best).

      Substandard can be perceived to be an exaggerated term,but most would agree that Bradley has a better resume,especially when you look at where his competition stood in the ranks when he had fought them.When you look at 3 of Khan's recent 6 opponents current careers,it is easy to dismiss them, let alone laugh-especially when you add up WHY they were selected (especially Paulie-he can't break that "glass jaw", and we all know Barrera's current state).

      Comment


      • #43
        Bradley is constantly improving, although I'm not against it, I'd rather he take care of Maidana, Khan or even Berto before he steps to Pacquiao. That's one of the main thing that separates Bradley from most guys in the sport...he's looking to get better. Right after the Alexander fight he was on some radio show (Can't remember name) and what he said was "I want to get right back in the gym, I want to work on my technique more".

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Webber676 View Post
          Bradley is right, he those recent Pacquiao opponents are stiffs, so only suggest Bradley to beat either of this stiff "Cotto, Clottey or Margarito" and then he get his shot at Pacman. Is that asking too much?
          At what weight, 147? If so, he'd beat all three in my opinion.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
            Top Rank Promotions CEO Bob Arum believes WBO/WBC junior welterweight champion Timothy Bradley might be a good match for southpaw WBO welterweight (147 pounds)titlist Manny Pacquiao as early as the fall or the first half of 2011. Bradley (27-0, 11 knockouts) believes that he will be the perfect opponent to defeat the 32-year-old Pacquiao (52-3-2, 38 KOs).

            [Click Here To Read More]
            Everybody sees the ****ty opposition except the Illiterate Congressman's midget army.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
              Look man,Pac could beat Bradley,but lets face it,none of Pac's recent opponents have deserved a shot at him.Bradley if anyone is at least undefeated and tops in 140.This whole "he hasn't earned a shot is b.s." Did Manny "earn" a shot at Cotto for his belt? How about Hatton or even the vacant JMW belt? You wanna tell me how Manny EARNED a shot when he hasn't fought in these weight classes before he got his title shot. The truth is,Manny got his chances and opportunities when he himself didn't work his way through the divisions,so why not give other up and comers a chance????


              Your absolutely right. Manny has fought nothing but names on the downslide since coming up in weight. Floyd is by far the P4P best in boxing. It's not even close. Manny brings excitement but so did Gatti and so many others. Manny hasn't even fought for a true title since coming up. He should have fought Bradley instead of Hatton. Definitely Bradley after Hatton at least. Bradley has fought and beaten some very highly touted fighters in their primes including 2 undefeated. That's something that Manny hasn't done so the Bradley needs to earn it BS needs to stop cause Clottey and Margarito damn sure didn't earn a shot when they got it.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
                At what weight, 147? If so, he'd beat all three in my opinion.
                Bradley is the fighter than fans should rally behind.He's absolutely right.Pacman has been taking soft touches since the catchweight Cotto fight bro,period.Clottey looses to Bradley,too much Offense for Clottey to ever really come out his shell.Margarito right now,too slow,old,flatfooted & Bradley has the conditioning to box circles around him all night.Mosley,clearly shot,Bradley out hustles him,moves too much & has the stamina of a triathlete.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Webber676 View Post
                  Bradley is right, he those recent Pacquiao opponents are stiffs, so only suggest Bradley to beat either of this stiff "Cotto, Clottey or Margarito" and then he get his shot at Pacman. Is that asking too much?
                  Who did Diaz and Clottey beat to get the shot at Manny?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
                    At what weight, 147? If so, he'd beat all three in my opinion.
                    Very solid point that most have overlooked....I doubt Clottey, Cotto or Margarito can even make 147 without being drained (Cotto wouldn't want to cut that weight anymore and Margarito wouldn't make 147 when he appeared to struggle badly and look dehydrated and thirsty making 150).Maybe Clottey can make the weight,but he has been out of the game for a year,so it's hard to say...

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
                      Look,I am not saying Khan is crap-don't misunderstand me.The thing I was saying is that Bradley's resume is better (I pointed that out to people saying Bradley doesn't have a legit arguement to face the best).

                      Substandard can be perceived to be an exaggerated term,but most would agree that Bradley has a better resume,especially when you look at where his competition stood in the ranks when he had fought them.When you look at 3 of Khan's recent 6 opponents current careers,it is easy to dismiss them, let alone laugh-especially when you add up WHY they were selected (especially Paulie-he can't break that "glass jaw", and we all know Barrera's current state).
                      Like I said I have no issue with people saying Bradley has a better resume but Khans resume is hardly substandard taking into account he is 24 years old and has just fought and beat someone who most perceive to be the hardest hitter and most dangerous opponent at 140.

                      I have no doubt that Khan and Bradley will fight sometime this year as long as Bradley doesn’t price himself out by asking for 50/50 split.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP