should ward vs froch be for the ring title?

**ИATAS** · 02-04-2011, 06:35 PM

hell yeah.

Honestly Froch should be #2 right now his resume is mucho better than Bute's.

But if he beats Glen Johnson, and bute beats some bum again, I reckon The Ring will bump him to #2.

**Bushbaby** · 02-04-2011, 07:26 PM

Yes,Froch & Ward should be for the ring with Bute given a chance to challenge..............if he dare.

**cleaner147** · 02-04-2011, 07:55 PM

the Ring already said NO. (Montiel-Donaire wont be for that title either)

they have said its unfair to BUTE. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

**FloydTBE** · 02-04-2011, 08:00 PM

they are top 2 in the 168lbs dibision, i dont se why not

**Pullcounter** · 02-04-2011, 08:13 PM

Originally posted by -TITAN-

if they meet in the super six final ?

depends on their rankings. #1 and #2 have to fight.

**goblin213** · 02-04-2011, 08:20 PM

Are you that sure about Froch beating Johnson?

**FloydTBE** · 02-04-2011, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by goblin213

Are you that sure about Froch beating Johnson?

will be an excitig fight, but froch UD's johnson

**Sweet Jesus** · 02-04-2011, 08:22 PM

I don't understand how Bute is even in the top 5.

***OG Wenger*** · 02-04-2011, 08:26 PM

Originally posted by goblin213

Are you that sure about Froch beating Johnson?

Im pretty certain Froch will beat Johnson. I had Green winning before the knock down in there fight and if it wasnt for the rabbit punch at the end of the 1st round i think it could have been a different fight. Johnson wont outbox Froch and i dont think he has the power to stop him. I will go as far to say that it will be an easy night for Froch.

should ward vs froch be for the ring title?