cool site.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather vs. Cotto post fight Thread -DON'T make new threads about the fight
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Dr. Ill View Poststop f0kking lying...
DEAL WITH IT..... DONT GO RUNNING AND DODGING, ****IN DEAL WITH IT....
Comment
-
Originally posted by FALLENSOLDIER View PostSh-t still stand though. Not only was he at 145 in a catchweight, he also had a rehydration clause put on him as well.... A rehydration clause is the true factor. Coming in at 145 wasnt too bad, but not being able to go back at his normal fight night weight is what killed him...
Think about this... For all the people that think the rehydration/catchweight didnt affect Cotto....
Pac dusted a weakened Cotto teh first time, but if you guys wanna push that, then ask yourself, why did Manny again ask for a catchweight on a fighter he dominated???
The answer is obvious.... He dominated because of the catchweight/rehydration clause
People can argue this and argue that, but at the end of the day people say Manny and Floyd in common opponents.. As Floyd stated after the fight. I fought him at a weight he was comfortable at, and not a "catchweight"
145 cotto was weaker with a rehydration clause just as Delahoya was as well with a rehydration Clause, and manny even outweighed delahoya!!!!!
SIMPLY PUT IT'S CAREFUL MATCHMAKING.
If Floyd had told Cotto he can only fight at a catchweight he would have been crucified, and rightfully so... because more is expected from Floyd than Manny....
We have seen manny not being able to cut the ring off. That Cotto last night would have been too big and strong for manny.... That cotto would have put marquez into retirement......
Comment
-
Originally posted by sdcluser View PostYes. But again. Opinions can differ. Maybe we oughta watch those fights again. Or you should seek other's opinion in this forum.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostIts the 10 lb + weight difference on Cotto , how you ignore this just shows your boxing ignorance , how can you have that much weight difference with no difference in the fighter , its madness ! One was tired and weak the other as strong as a bull with no sign of slowing , open your eyes to this sport !
Comment
-
Originally posted by FALLENSOLDIER View PostBro you cant even be taken serious at all. I mean we are supposed to listen at you supposedly subjective, when you got a pic insinuating the man is gay in your signature???
Seriously no need to bother with you as you are a clown, and it shows...
boxings0cialistdotcom/profiles/blogs/bob-arum-leaves-himself-open-to-criticism-again-part-1
Put that in your browser, then come back to debate. I mean apples are apples and oranges are oranges....
You cant piss on my leg and tell me it's raining....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by El Angel View PostHow did you score it? You're unbiased Floyd fan. I had it 116-112 and was on the fence about the 11th, because of low activity from both, but I gave it to Mayweather.
118-110 if you favored what Floyd did throughout.
117-111 if you were pretty even on what you thought both did.
116-112 if you favored what Cotto was doing.
Anything closer or wider is pretty absurd no doubt.
I had it 118-110 Floyd, could easily see 117-111, with 116-112 at the very very closest. Cotto won rounds 6 and 8 watching it live, could have won one of the other close couple rounds. But even in rounds with slower action, which was the case in those couple close rounds, it favors Floyd.
Comment
Comment