I thought you were going to say that he is talentless and he has ape-like wide looping punches. guess I was wrong
A thing I noticed about Sam Peter
Collapse
-
Like I said, Peter isn't talented at all. He throws wide punches and has bad, bad footwork. He's gonna eat a ton of punches, and through accumulation Wlad is going to knock this guy out.Originally posted by hollisterIke was a pretty good fighter, I'm not sure I'd compare him
and Peter just yet lolComment
-
Taurus Sykes is an absolutely terrible boxer. period. exclamation point! wlad wouldve knocked him out in the 1stOriginally posted by raesaadTrue indeed I noticed this too and actually thought Sykes at least was going to give him and pretty good fight he looked like a pretty good boxer but Peter finished him with like a 15 punch barrage so the way I see it one good shot to stun Wlad and if he follows it up with a barrage like that Wlad will not get up either , on the flip side same goes for Peter, Wlad is a great finisher as well but I like the younger ,more confident Peter to do the finishing just my opinion tough.Comment
-
eh, what do you know? Moron.Originally posted by InThisCornerLike I said, Peter isn't talented at all. He throws wide punches and has bad, bad footwork. He's gonna eat a ton of punches, and through accumulation Wlad is going to knock this guy out.Comment
-
-
-
I totally agree. Peter isnt ****Originally posted by InThisCornerI'm the moron? Let me guess your picking Peter to win?Comment
-
IDIOT,Originally posted by PBF34true, peter isnt a very good boxer, but hes a slugger. thats why, when he ko's vitali in 7 or 8, he will be consideribly behind on all judges scorecards...
Peter is fighting Wlad, not VitaliComment
-

Comment