do you think "Superfight" turned out to be an actual superfight?

**Steven Adams** · 01-30-2011, 02:52 AM

you are not alone

**Killa Killa** · 01-30-2011, 02:53 AM

Definitely wasn't Hagler-Hearns like they said...

Just when a fight not involving Pacquiao or Mayweather was getting a lot of media attention, it ends up not living up to it's billing....

I enjoyed the fight, but I'm sure it didn't change the general public's opinion of boxing....

**Crazylegs77** · 01-30-2011, 02:57 AM

it should have been a good fight in theory doesnt always work out

**JOM'S** · 01-30-2011, 03:07 AM

actually prior the fight I have been reading that based on their style match-up this could be boring...

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 01-30-2011, 03:12 AM

It never was a superfight. It was basically another title defence for Bradley. Alexander was a phony ass paper champ anyway

**Zarco** · 01-30-2011, 04:00 AM

Nothing super about this fight.

**Heeb** · 01-30-2011, 04:03 AM

Its your own fault if you thought it was a super fight in the first place.

**u.b.r.** · 01-30-2011, 04:10 AM

It's Alexander. If people didn't realize it from the Kotelnik fight, they should know it now.

**el malo** · 01-30-2011, 04:10 AM

Originally posted by ronnie_N.

i don't know with you guys, but it ain't worth the hype...

is it the styles? or is it the fighters themselves?...

it just wasn't a "superfight" to begin with. you just bought into the hype. it was a good fight between 2 good fighters, nothing "super" about it.

do you think "Superfight" turned out to be an actual superfight?