What happens if Pac didn't fought Oscar and just stayed at 135?

[Bastian Loc]

Damn! You're kidding right?

So Pacquiao would've lost to those smaller guys rather than the likes of DLH, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, Marg...

Either you're a hater or just plain ******!

Those guys were prime and have the boxing style to beat Fudge.

Oscar was beyond shot and weight drained, Hatton was also shot and frankly never that good and tailor made for Fudge, Cotto was weight drained and sabotaged, Clottey was a decent win, and Tony was way shot and weight drained.

[Ryannn]

You either ignore previous posts or you are simply too dumb to understand them. Roach said it himself how DLH was damaged goods, not able to pull the trigger, shot etc. They knew what they were up against.

de la hoya was a bigger threat than guzman, soto, and campbell at that point.

if you can't see that, then there's something wrong with you.

[Tamis!]

Those guys were prime and have the boxing style to beat Fudge.

Oscar was beyond shot and weight drained, Hatton was also shot and frankly never that good and tailor made for Fudge, Cotto was weight drained and sabotaged, Clottey was a decent win, and Tony was way shot and weight drained.

LOL. Hatton, Cotto either shot or drained? And you have to pick Clottey as a decent win??? Over any of those guys???

There you go folks, pac's most decent win was against an armadillo

I'd give you DLH, but damn compare Campbell to any of those guys???

Have a good day sir! Now that post confirms you're both a hater and ******!

[Dagomba]

de la hoya was a bigger threat than guzman, soto, and campbell at that point.

if you can't see that, then there's something wrong with you.

Oscar was a bigger name and attraction along with physical size which wasn't a factor because of the reasons stated on my previous comment. He was not a bigger threat than prime opponents comfortable with their weight at 135. Just like JMM is a bigger threat to Pacquiao than Margarito was. Their skills and style is what determines the risk. Not just their size.

[Bastian Loc]

LOL. Hatton, Cotto either shot or drained? And you have to pick Clottey as a decent win??? Over any of those guys???

There you go folks, pac's most decent win was against an armadillo

I'd give you DLH, but damn compare Campbell to any of those guys???

Have a good day sir! Now that post confirms you're both a hater and ******!

Clottey was the only one that wasn't shot and weight drained. He was picked because he doesn't throw punches.

Hatton was totally destroyed by Floyd and was never that good to begin with. Cotto was weight drained and sabotaged.

Campbell has better skills to beat someone like Pac than all the guys you listed.

You're a moron who doesnt' know **** about boxing. Aka a typical *******.

[Un.clesam]

LOL. Hatton, Cotto either shot or drained? And you have to pick Clottey as a decent win??? Over any of those guys???

There you go folks, pac's most decent win was against an armadillo

I'd give you DLH, but damn compare Campbell to any of those guys???

Have a good day sir! Now that post confirms you're both a hater and ******!

why are you wasting your time with that clown. same guy who thinks margarito is not a cheater and was just sabotaged.

[PACnPBFsuck]

de la hoya was a bigger threat than guzman, soto, and campbell at that point.

if you can't see that, then there's something wrong with you.

I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one, when Guzman called Pac out, Guzman combinations, footwork and power were better than Pac at that time.

Pac was exposed by JMM, that he couldn't handle a counter puncher, which Guzman was probably the best at that weight at that time.

The problem is that he didn't face DLH at that point, he faced him just to when he wasn't at his best.

[Tamis!]

Clottey was the only one that wasn't shot and weight drained. He was picked because he doesn't throw punches.

Hatton was totally destroyed by Floyd and was never that good to begin with. Cotto was weight drained and sabotaged.

Campbell has better skills to beat someone like Pac than all the guys you listed.

You're a moron who doesnt' know **** about boxing. Aka a typical *******.

If I'm a moron, you're an imbecile...

LOL!

[Un.clesam]

I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one, when Guzman called Pac out, Guzman combinations, footwork and power were better than Pac at that time.

Pac was exposed by JMM, that he couldn't handle a counter puncher, which Guzman was probably the best at that weight at that time.

The problem is that he didn't face DLH at that point, he faced him just to when he wasn't at his best.

hey idiot.. everybody thinks pac-dlh was a joke not because dlh was weight drained. pac was actually a big underdog.

its AFTER THE FACT all these weight drained happened. go figure

[Jack Napier]

at the time, it was supposed to be Pac-Valero
that woulda been great
could be Pac-Soto and Pac-Juan Diaz
definitely Pac-JMM 3 woulda happened
Pac woulda still been kicking ass
but he wouldn't have become mainstream
Oscar makes megastars when he loses :laugh: