Why can't people accept that VK is the best out there?

**ZABJUDAH#1P4P** · 09-05-2005, 12:38 PM

Originally posted by Nautilus

...

GOSH

probably cause hes not, rahman will KO this bum once and for all.

**strongisland24** · 09-05-2005, 12:46 PM

both klits cant box

**RastaSmoker** · 09-05-2005, 12:48 PM

wlad is a better boxer, he doesnt have that european stiffness to his fighting, unlike his brother. Wlad is not the best, but VK is. If maskaev can KO rahman out, then VK you know can. Besides if lewis couldnt do it, how could rahman.

**DANGER13** · 09-05-2005, 12:48 PM

i think there ok probably the best heaveyweights but once a good hw joins the division there dun. they can easily b beat if u get the right fighter. toney cant be vitali.

**theironone** · 09-05-2005, 12:51 PM

ive said before hes the best of a bad bunch, ****in flashback to 84-86

**Leo Pradun** · 09-05-2005, 12:55 PM

Vitali is the best.
He has the complete package of everything u need in this sport
Hes got good height which he knows how to use, hes always in shape, hes got great power (most of his wins are by KO), hes clearly the smartest boxer and knows what punch to throw when, hes got a a great chin hes never been knocked down, and he clearly has heart which he showed in the LL fight, overall hes is the best fighter right now....

**ZABJUDAH#1P4P** · 09-05-2005, 01:00 PM

Originally posted by Leo Pradun

Vitali is the best.
He has the complete package of everything u need in this sport
Hes got good height which he knows how to use, hes always in shape, hes got great power (most of his wins are by KO), hes clearly the smartest boxer and knows what punch to throw when, hes got a a great chin hes never been knocked down, and he clearly has heart which he showed in the LL fight, overall hes is the best fighter right now....

yeah hes got the speed, accuracy, defense, and footwork down perfect huh?

**Bozo_no no** · 09-05-2005, 01:00 PM

Beating a 260lb Kirk Johnson, an old and inactive Corrie Sanders, and Danny Williams doesn't prove anything when the division is as fragmented as it is.

The bottom line is that everyone (of the 4 title holders) is at square one at Heavyweight. All of them. None of them are particularly impressive, they've all fought soft opposition to a certian extent, and they're all too inactive.

Until titles start to get unified, there is no "best" at Heavyweight.

**ZABJUDAH#1P4P** · 09-05-2005, 01:04 PM

Originally posted by Bozo_no_no

Beating a 260lb Kirk Johnson, an old and inactive Corrie Sanders, and Danny Williams doesn't prove anything when the division is as fragmented as it is.

The bottom line is that everyone (of the 4 title holders) is at square one at Heavyweight. All of them. None of them are particularly impressive, they've all fought soft opposition to a certian extent, and they're all too inactive.

Until titles start to get unified, there is no "best" at Heavyweight.

i would pick all title holders to beat him

toney, byrd, and brewster

toney is still champ in my book **** ruiz and that bull**** steroid crap

Why can't people accept that VK is the best out there?