What will it prove if you bring up all the bums Ali fought? Sure he fought alot of bums. But he still has the BEST RESUME EVER at Heavyweight. It's all about the best wins. Wlad lost against Ross Purrity who is more of a bum than Spinks and Wepner. What's the point of bringing up somebodys worst wins when talking about resumes? That's like me brining up Exum Speight who Wlad fought in his second fight, speight had a record of 8 wins and 80 losses. It doesn't prove anything. You brining up Spinks and Wepner doesn't prove anything more than me brining up Exum Speight.
Ali beat these guys.
Frazier TWICE
Liston TWICE
Foreman
Patterson
Norton
Shavers
Quarry
Alis resumes is alot better than Wlads, it's a fact. And your ******ed logic of bringing up all the bums Ali fought doesn't change that. Want me to bring up all the bums Wlad fought in his 30 first fights?
Ali beat these guys.
Frazier TWICE
Liston TWICE
Foreman
Patterson
Norton
Shavers
Quarry
Alis resumes is alot better than Wlads, it's a fact. And your ******ed logic of bringing up all the bums Ali fought doesn't change that. Want me to bring up all the bums Wlad fought in his 30 first fights?
Comment