more skilled wlad or manny

[boxer2k5]

Manny = lateral movement. head movement. great footspeed in weight class. power in both hands without having to plant feet. blazing combos, punches in bunches on the move. best in an and out movement in the history of boxing.


Vlad = powerful straight right. left hook. needs to planet feet. great jab. big. stiff as a board. slow feet. no head movement. no lateral movement.

best in and out in history of boxing???????????????????? easy to say against guys who footwork is compared to mob victims with cement shoes on

[boxer2k5]

wlad he makes adjustments. he sets you up an put you out. manny is a little rock em sock em robot.

[Rassclot]

wlad he makes adjustments. he sets you up an put you out. manny is a little rock em sock em robot.

another handicap.


did I accidentally stumble across the Special Ed forum?

[llamas1]

the point is Vlad is not even in Manny's league in terms of P4P skills.

Different galaxies.

Vlad relies too much on size.


If Vlad was giving up size to his opponents regularly with his current skill set.... would he be successful?


If Vlad was smaller and shorter than Lamon Brewster. Brewster knocks him out 10/10 times.


Manny is someone that made a career out of fighting people who are much larger than him.

Well said... Not even in the same Galaxy. They fight someone their own size with moderate skills it's all over. A Lennox Lewis in his prime works them both over...... P4P the Klitchkos don't even register on the list...

[J-A-D-AKISS]

i was in consistent in saying he made a career out of moving up and beating bigger men. MADE A CAREER OUT OF. it does not mean he fought bigger men his entire career which is something u keep wanting to see but still fail to comprehend.

you really need professional help.

way to back track

but no digging yourself from this hole

[joelab75]

Floyd Mayweather is better than Manny in every department. Juan Manuel Marquez (won both fights imo) = Pacquiao. Good, not great. The rest of it is pure hype.

every department? is Floyd your god?
FLoyd has better combination? faster combo? better offense? bigger puncher? better lateral movement?

damn! another idiot poster.!!

LOL at comparing Manny to Marquez.

[brick wall]

who got more skills is really not that important. what matters most is accomplishments. what came out of those skills...that's the more compelling aspect about a fighter. now if there's a fighter who got inferior skills but accomplished more than those who got more skills than him then that says a lot. that only proves skills is not everything...it's just one of the many ingredients to become a sucessful fighter.

[J-A-D-AKISS]

who got more skills is really not that important. what matters most is accomplishments. what came out of those skills...that's the more compelling aspect about a fighter. now if there's a fighter who got inferior skills but accomplished more than those who got more skills than him then that says a lot. that only proves skills is not everything...it's just one of the many ingredients to become a sucessful fighter.

it is important since that is the the topic and question of the thread.

if u want to do a thread about accomplished go right ahead.

i just asked a question about their skills and who had the better skills.

[Pacquiao'd]

name a boxer with better in and out movement and we can debate it.

what makes manny one of the ATG is his in and out movement. it is the greatest of the modern era without any debate. Among the ATG it's certainly up for debate.

floyd. you lost

[brick wall]

it is important since that is the the topic and question of the thread.

if u want to do a thread about accomplished go right ahead.

i just asked a question about their skills and who had the better skills.

i'm just saying because there's really no way to quantify skills so threads like yours usually end up in ****** debates. but then maybe that's what you wish to happen so yeah i must leave your thread now before it drags me down to your inanity.