"Stone for Stone" instead of " Pound for Pound"?!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • grayfist
    Just old, not wise
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 2611
    • 152
    • 303
    • 9,016

    #1

    "Stone for Stone" instead of " Pound for Pound"?!

    Fighters in recent years are ever more frequently introduced using the metric system when their stats are cited by ring announcers. In view of this, should the list of great ones be changed from "Pound for Pound" to "Kilo for Kilo". To me, the latter just doesn't sound as good as the former.

    If I may make a suggestion: if a change has to me made, (though, I'm not saying a change has to be made) why not use the British measurement? Let's go "Stone for Stone"! Sounds more awesome!
  • JaNnO
    The Specialist
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2004
    • 2334
    • 210
    • 116
    • 9,630

    #2
    Originally posted by grayfist
    Fighters in recent years are ever more frequently introduced using the metric system when their stats are cited by ring announcers. In view of this, should the list of great ones be changed from "Pound for Pound" to "Kilo for Kilo". To me, the latter just doesn't sound as good as the former.

    If I may make a suggestion: if a change has to me made, (though, I'm not saying a change has to be made) why not use the British measurement? Let's go "Stone for Stone"! Sounds more awesome!
    how about ""Gram for Gram"...doesn't sound good to me...just the first one that came to my mind.

    Comment

    • psychopath
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2004
      • 5085
      • 196
      • 266
      • 5,396

      #3
      Originally posted by grayfist
      Fighters in recent years are ever more frequently introduced using the metric system when their stats are cited by ring announcers. In view of this, should the list of great ones be changed from "Pound for Pound" to "Kilo for Kilo". To me, the latter just doesn't sound as good as the former.

      If I may make a suggestion: if a change has to me made, (though, I'm not saying a change has to be made) why not use the British measurement? Let's go "Stone for Stone"! Sounds more awesome!

      That sounds real funny Bro!

      Comment

      • moochi
        We need one organization!
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2004
        • 3444
        • 378
        • 60
        • 26,344

        #4
        i think kilo to kilo, or even better K2K sounds a lot better...........because the brits think a pound is their currency.

        Comment

        • grayfist
          Just old, not wise
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 2611
          • 152
          • 303
          • 9,016

          #5
          Originally posted by moochi
          i think kilo to kilo, or even better K2K sounds a lot better...........because the brits think a pound is their currency.
          Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

          Comment

          • The1God
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Aug 2004
            • 941
            • 80
            • 66
            • 7,579

            #6
            For some reason it sounds like a drug deal or drug barter.

            Lets measure their height by Furlongs!

            Comment

            • grayfist
              Just old, not wise
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2004
              • 2611
              • 152
              • 303
              • 9,016

              #7
              Originally posted by The1God
              For some reason it sounds like a drug deal or drug barter.

              Lets measure their height by Furlongs!
              HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP