Best brother combo in boxing history? IMO it is?

[-Jay-]

You could argue for them but they fought in a mediocre heavyweight era!! The Marquez brothers on the other hand fought real elite fighters!!

True, but that isn't the fault of Wlad or Vitali.

[Bastian Loc]

Are you purposely trolling this thread?

No, JMM's only loss is to Fraud.

so now you're making up wins...

The judges aren't always right Larry. You think Pascal/Hopkins was a draw because the judges said so?

[BxFanViento]

All three!

I like all three brother groups

The Marquez Bro's are both hall of famers and have victories over legitimate competition and have proven to be both skilled boxers and tough counter punchers.

The Klitschko are also Hall Of Famers, it's a shame that their reign has been in perhaps the weakest era for Heavyweight boxing but irregardless they are the best Heavyweights today and victories over Arreola,Chambers,Byrd,Sanders etc have verified that despite the era.

Michael and Leon Spinks first pair of bro's to become heavyweight champs in a great era for Heavyweights.



Boxing the only sport where Brothers go into battle and become champions of the world

[jrosales13]

True, but that isn't the fault of Wlad or Vitali.

True, is not their fault but they shouldn't get extra credit for that either.

I mean Vitaly best win is what? Corrie Sanders? Arreola? I mean C'mon....You know the crap Haye pulled on the K-Bro's. They never fought Ruiz, who was probably is arguably the best HW in the last decade overall not named Klitschko.

[jrosales13]

No, JMM's only loss is to Fraud.

If he's only lost is to a fraud, then what does that make JMM?

And, he has more losses.

[Thread Stealer]

I'll go with the Marquez brothers, followed by the Klitschkos, then Spinks.

While Michael Spinks is the greatest of the 6 fighters, Leon was the weakest of the 6, despite winning the HW title after little pro experience. Ali was a shot fighter by 1978, not to mention already showing signs of Parkinsons/brain damage.

[Bastian Loc]

If he's only lost is to a fraud, then what does that make JMM?

And, he has more losses.

A career featherweight who dared to be great 21 pounds above his natural weight class.

Fraud was not only much bigger naturally, but he was an awful style matchup for JMM.

If people go back and watch the fights with Pac, Norwood and John, they will see that all fights were robberies. Especially the Pac and John fights.

[jrosales13]

A career featherweight who dared to be great 21 pounds above his natural weight class.

Fraud was not only much bigger naturally, but he was an awful style matchup for JMM.

If people go back and watch the fights with Pac, Norwood and John, they will see that all fights were robberies. Especially the Pac and John fights.

No not all were robberies. You just being a troll or just a big nuthugger.

Not every close fight that goes the opposite way is a robbery.

[Bastian Loc]

No not all were robberies. You just being a troll or just a big nuthugger.

Not every close fight that goes the opposite way is a robbery.

They were all robberies. Arum had it out for JMM from the start and shafted him in the fights with pac.

The Norwood and John fights are too obvious. JMM is too good for his own good.

That's the problem.

[jrosales13]

They were all robberies. Arum had it out for JMM from the start and shafted him in the fights with pac.

The Norwood and John fights are too obvious. JMM is too good for his own good.

That's the problem.

,

I didn't even notice that you were Jack.

Wasted my time