I don't like Floyd, but he deserves more props for his win agaisnt Shane than Cotto's

[Iceta Lives]

Dudes like "Black Irish" think this fool Iceta, is trying to have a real intelligent debate... this is just hater-troll BS. Yo Black Irish, you must not get out of the house much.

If Iceta is too dumb to see the HUGE difference in the Mosley that fought Mayweather (a 2 round senior citizen) vs the Mosley that fought Cotto, then he doesn't deserve to start threads. Registered haters should not be allowed to post, only read...

Mayweather beat Mosley after he beat the guy that had just ass reamed Cotto like I mentioned before fam. I'm not saying there's no difference at all. I'm just saying that if there is one it's not huge.

[Plaster...Sad.]

Mayweather beat Mosley after he beat the guy that had just ass reamed Cotto like I mentioned before fam. I'm not saying there's no difference at all. I'm just saying that if there is one it's not huge.

Oh ok, forget logic then. I'll just go by your opinion!

[egreezy]

Lets not forget Shane had Richardson in his corner against Floyd and still had dad against Cotto

[AP♠]

So I guess Floyd beating him didn't have anything to do with that.

Floyd never wanted any part of cotto back in the day.i don't have to be a below avg boxing fan to know this.you can justify how floyds win was bigger and that'd cool but it doesn't change the fact that floyd would want more to do now with cotto then before.

[SNVDoublePunch!]

It was Cotto's best win and it was very good. It was probably one of Mayweather's best wins, and it was good.

[DeadRiser]

I see no real way you can see Floyds win as better than Cottos win vs Shane. Floyd was more dominant but that was expected. Shane gassed out like a old man in that fight, and you know in your heart he was way more fresh vs Cotto. He wasn't in his prime but by the time he got to Floyd he was def past it. Bro, it's common sense.

Cotto clearly, I say again, CLEARLY, won that fight. If you see it another way you are looking for **** to bash Cotto on. Cotto did not run at all in thatfigt he just boxed a bit more and secured his win. That's not runnig. Oscar vs Tito is running. Floyd beat an older Mosley and there's no way Cotto lost that fight I'm sorry you are wrong in every way.

Cotto boxed beautifully and was aggressive as well he landed bombs on Shane, real bombs and combos - the commentators even said they hadn't seen punches landed so hard in years so if you really believe Cotto lost or his win was worst than Floyds that's sad.

[Va_BoriKua]

Mayweather beat Mosley after he beat the guy that had just ass reamed Cotto like I mentioned before fam. I'm not saying there's no difference at all. I'm just saying that if there is one it's not huge.

u act like shane had beat marg 3 months prior it was a year and 3 months later. Shane was older and had looked like **** vs mayorga. The difference is Cotto is alot of people thought Mosley would beat Cotto. Everyone knew Floyd was goin to beat Shane.

[Einstien]

this guy hates cotto.

[loui_ludwig]

Mosley was 2 1/2 years older, trained for almost 2 months and hasn't fought in over a year against Mayweather.

[DeadRiser]

TS got owned he's a Cotto basher blinded too think Cotto had a weak fight and ran at the end - yeah buddy - in ur own twisted mind. I'm a real Cotto fan and it pisses me off when dudes like you, who always happen to be a Mexican hater (who are actually a minority as I know many great Mexicans), start some **** talking on a great fighter like Cotto. Take a ***in walk dude Cotto won fair and square and Floyd won yrs later vs a Mosely who cant even fight past 2 rounds.