The future of boxing will be the winner of Bradley vs Alexander.

[Pullcounter]

right now, khan is not the #1 guy at 140 lbs. that guy is bradley.

[Steak]

Maybe if Khan beat him legitimately, you can look at that win and shrug your shoulders at most, but that fight should have been a NC.

I think its shady they took so long to stop the fight, yes.

doesnt change the fact Khan had won every round.

[Bushbaby]

You are indeed correct.**** that **** everyone else is talking.Beating Alexander or Bradley are the way to #1 at 140 & up the ladder of the fabled pfp list.

[Steelhammer2011]

******ed thread

Top 2 at 140

1. Khan
2. Kotelnik

Who has Bradley beat?

Alexander The Fraud was schooled, outclassed, dominated and humiliated by Kotelnik in front of his hometown fans. Worst robbery of 2010.

[RubenSonny]

Khan practically shut out Kotelnik, who most people think beat Alexander.

I dont think its a stretch to say a Kotelnik win is better than an Alexander win. especially considering how Khan did it.

and then you have wins over Barrera, Maidana and Malignaggi.
seems pretty clear to me.

Although to be fair, if Bradley beats Alexander he has a case for being best in the division.

Could you say a win over Corley is better than a win over Maidana?

I think Bradley is clearly number 1 at 140lbs with wins over Peterson, Holt, Witter, Vasquez and Cherry.

[Pullcounter]

bradley and alexander are unifed champs at 140 lbs

khan holds a paper title.

[Steak]

Could you say a win over Corley is better than a win over Maidana?

I think Bradley is clearly number 1 at 140lbs with wins over Peterson, Holt, Witter, Vasquez and Cherry.

no, why would I? Corley didnt beat Maidana.

if Bradley beats Alexander(depending on how he beats him), he has a good argument for being #1 at 140.

wins over Kotelnik, Maidana and Malignaggi are above what Bradley has done, imo. people hate Malignaggi, but he was a quality fighter in the division.

[Pullcounter]

Khan practically shut out Kotelnik, who most people think beat Alexander.

styles make fights. khan has to beat alexander first before you give him credit over alexander.

I dont think its a stretch to say a Kotelnik win is better than an Alexander win. especially considering how Khan did it.

you gotta wait until after bradley/alexander to make that call. depends on how well bradley performs. In any case, khan has to fight the winner of bradley/alexander to claim 140 lbs supremacy

and then you have wins over Barrera, Maidana and Malignaggi.
seems pretty clear to me.

1) mab is old and got robbed of a fair fight. that cut was really bad and the fight should;ve been stopped.

2) khan ran for his life against maidana

3) malignaggi is featherfisted and beat up a lightweight. c'mon.

Although to be fair, if Bradley beats Alexander he has a case for being best in the division.

the winner of bradley/alexander is the unified champ. the best of the division is the winner of that fight vs. khan. don't start counting ur eggs yet...

[RubenSonny]

no, why would I? Corley didnt beat Maidana.

if Bradley beats Alexander(depending on how he beats him), he has a good argument for being #1 at 140.

wins over Kotelnik, Maidana and Malignaggi are above what Bradley has done, imo. people hate Malignaggi, but he was a quality fighter in the division.

Because you were saying you thought Kotelnik beat Alexander(I agree) so he could be a better win than Alexander, I and many others think Maidana lost to Corley, you see what I'm saying?

[wazaa.]

Business at 140 won't be settled until the winner of Bradley-Alexander faces Amir.