Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rip Off

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Pay per view is the cause of the overall decline in interest in boxing.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Sonny
      Pay per view is the cause of the overall decline in interest in boxing.

      It is not priced reasonably also. They should charge non-commercial subscribers a much lower rate.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Sonny
        Pay per view is the cause of the overall decline in interest in boxing.

        If you get your money's worth, I think its OK. The biggest problem is that 9 out 10, you won't get your money's worth. That's why PPV stinks. That's why boxing is dying.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by lapulapu
          If you get your money's worth, I think its OK. The biggest problem is that 9 out 10, you won't get your money's worth. That's why PPV stinks. That's why boxing is dying.
          YUP! Very TRUE! just take last saturday's PPV.
          But damn its a tempting fight to wanna buy. Is any going to do some play by play that night?

          BTW who the hell is Zab fighting?:????

          Comment


          • #15
            Zab is fighting some nobody, again. Who cares about Zab, he's a chicken ****. When offered the fight with Cintron he turned it down only to talk **** afterwards.

            Tito will win this fight, tho. I'm paying to see Mayo get his ass KOd for the first time.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by PRboxingfan
              Zab is fighting some nobody, again. Who cares about Zab, he's a chicken ****. When offered the fight with Cintron he turned it down only to talk **** afterwards.

              Tito will win this fight, tho. I'm paying to see Mayo get his ass KOd for the first time.
              Mayorga's been KO'd before in 1993.

              Comment


              • #17
                Far to many PPVs now. If they had purse fights, that would improve the sport. I will watch any two people fight. But I won't pay for any fight. Tito has always been one of my favorites to watch. I just cant twist my arm hard enough to shell out 50 for this. I paid for DLH vs Hopkins, If showtime didn't have their "free" card playing, I would have twisted harder. I hope the compitition is like this, it may make these major networks wake up.

                Comment


                • #18
                  If you like to see talented, quality fighters in a super-competitive fight...you'll watch the Showtime card to see OUMA-PHILLIPS, not Wlad-Williamson.

                  Tito-Mayorga, no matter what, is a super-intriguing & potentially explosive match.
                  The styles are there, & so is the importance.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    I'm still not sure if I'll buy this one or not. The main thing that worries me is that if I do go ahead and order it they might replay it anyway next Sat. I doubt it cause there isnt another fight scheduled for next Sat., so there will be no need to replay it on the undercard. So, the minute I dont rent it , they wont replay it; the minute I do rent it, they will replay it and I'll feel like an ass.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by tracylee
                      I'm still not sure if I'll buy this one or not. The main thing that worries me is that if I do go ahead and order it they might replay it anyway next Sat. I doubt it cause there isnt another fight scheduled for next Sat., so there will be no need to replay it on the undercard. So, the minute I dont rent it , they wont replay it; the minute I do rent it, they will replay it and I'll feel like an ass.
                      HBO doesn't have a "free" card until Nov. 20.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP